:: wikimiki.org ::

Mass

Mass

:For other senses of this word, see mass (disambiguation). Mass is a property of physical objects that, roughly speaking, measures the amount of matter they contain. Unlike weight, the mass of something stays the same regardless of location. It is a central concept of classical mechanics and related subjects. Strictly speaking, there are three different quantities called mass:
- Inertial mass is a measure of an object's inertia: its resistance to changing its state of motion when a force is applied. An object with small inertial mass changes its motion more readily, and an object with large inertial mass does so less readily.
- Passive gravitational mass is a measure of the strength of an object's interaction with the gravitational field. Within the same gravitational field, an object with a smaller passive gravitational mass experiences a smaller force than an object with a larger passive gravitational mass. (This force is called the weight of the object. In informal usage, the word "weight" is often used synonymously with "mass", because the strength of the gravitational field is roughly constant everywhere on the surface of the Earth. In physics, the two terms are distinct: an object will have a larger weight if it is placed in a stronger gravitational field, but its passive gravitational mass remains unchanged.)
- Active gravitational mass is a measure of the strength of the gravitational field due to a particular object. For example, the gravitational field that one experiences on the Moon is weaker than that of the Earth because the Moon has less active gravitational mass.

Introduction

Although inertial mass, passive gravitational mass and active gravitational mass are conceptually distinct, no experiment has ever unambiguously demonstrated any difference between them. One of the consequences of the equivalence of inertial mass and passive gravitational mass is the fact, famously demonstrated by Galileo Galilei, that objects with different masses fall at the same rate, assuming factors like air resistance are negligible. The theory of general relativity, the most accurate theory of gravitation known to physicists to date, rests on the assumption that inertial and passive gravitational mass are completely equivalent. This is known as the weak equivalence principle. Classically, active and passive gravitational mass were equivalent as a consequence of Newton's third law, but a new axiom is required in the context of relativity's reformulation of gravity and mechanics. Thus, standard general relativity also assumes the equivalence of inertial mass and active gravitational mass; this equivalence is sometimes called the strong equivalence principle. If one were to treat inertial mass m_i, passive gravitational mass m_p, and active gravitational mass m_a distinctly, Newton's law of universal gravitation would give as force on the second mass due to the first mass :

m_a_2=\frac.

Newton's third law, of reciprocal actions, shows that active and passive mass are proportional. As a result they can be defined to be equal.

Units of mass

In the SI system of units, mass is measured in kilograms (kg). Many other units of mass are also employed, such as: grams (g), metric tons, pounds, ounces, long and short tons, quintals, slugs, atomic mass units, Planck masses, solar masses, and eV/c². The eV/c² unit is based on the electron volt (eV), which is normally used as a unit of energy. However, because of the relativistic connection between (rest) mass and energy, E = mc² (see below), it is possible to use any unit of energy as a unit of mass instead. Thus, in particle physics where mass and energy are often interchanged, it is common to use not only eV/c² but even simply eV as a unit of mass (roughly 1.783 × 10^-36 kg). Because the gravitational acceleration is approximately constant on the surface of the Earth, a unit like the pound is often used to measure either mass or force (e.g. weight), although the pound is officially defined as a unit of mass. For more information on the different units of mass, see Orders of magnitude (mass).

Inertial mass

Inertial mass is the mass of an object measured by its resistance to acceleration. To understand what the inertial mass of a body is, one begins with classical mechanics and Newton's Laws of Motion. Later on, we will see how our classical definition of mass must be altered if we take into consideration the theory of special relativity, which is more accurate than classical mechanics. However, the implications of special relativity will not change the meaning of "mass" in any essential way. According to Newton's second law, we say that a body has a mass m if, at any instant of time, it obeys the equation of motion :

F = \frac (mv)

where F is the force acting on the body and v is its velocity. For the moment, we will put aside the question of what "force acting on the body" actually means. Now, suppose that the mass of the body in question is a constant. This assumption, known as the conservation of mass, rests on the ideas that (i) mass is a measure of the amount of matter contained in a body, and (ii) matter can never be created or destroyed, only split up or recombined. These are very reasonable assumptions for everyday objects, though, as we will see, the situation gets more complicated when we take special relativity into account. Another point to note is that, even in classical mechanics, it is sometimes useful to treat the mass of an object as changing with time. For example, the mass of a rocket decreases as the rocket fires. However, this is an approximation, based on ignoring pieces of matter which enter or leave the system. In the case of the rocket, these pieces correspond to the ejected propellent; if we were to measure the total mass of the rocket and its propellent, we would find that it is conserved. When the mass of a body is constant, Newton's second law becomes :

F = m \frac = m a

where a denotes the acceleration of the body. This equation illustrates how mass relates to the inertia of a body. Consider two objects with different masses. If we apply an identical force to each, the object with a bigger mass will experience a smaller acceleration, and the object with a smaller mass will experience a bigger acceleration. We might say that the larger mass exerts a greater "resistance" to changing its state of motion in response to the force. However, this notion of applying "identical" forces to different objects brings us back to the fact that we have not really defined what a force is. We can sidestep this difficulty with the help of Newton's third law, which states that if one object exerts a force on a second object, it will experience an equal and opposite force. To be precise, suppose we have two objects A and B, with constant inertial masses m_A and m_B. We isolate the two objects from all other physical influences, so that the only forces present are the force exerted on A by B, which we denote F_AB, and the force exerted on B by A, which we denote F_BA. As we have seen, Newton's second law states that :

F_ = m_A a_A \,

and

F_ = m_B a_B \,

where a_A and a_B are the accelerations of A and B respectively. Suppose that these accelerations are non-zero, so that the forces between the two objects are non-zero. This occurs, for example, if the two objects are in the process of colliding with one another. Newton's third law then states that :

F_ = - F_ \,

Substituting this into the previous equations, we obtain :

m_A = - \frac \, m_B

Note that our requirement that a_A be non-zero ensures that the fraction is well-defined. This is, in principle, how we would measure the inertial mass of an object. We choose a "reference" object and define its mass m_B as (say) 1 kilogram. Then we can measure the mass of every other object in the universe by colliding it with the reference object and measuring the accelerations.

Gravitational mass

Gravitational mass is the mass of an object measured using the effect of a gravitational field on the object. The concept of gravitational mass rests on Newton's law of gravitation. Let us suppose we have two objects A and B, separated by a distance |r_AB|. The law of gravitation states that if A and B have gravitational masses M_A and M_B respectively, then each object exerts a gravitational force on the other, of magnitude :

|F| =

where G is the universal gravitational constant. The above statement may be reformulated in the following way: if g is the acceleration of a reference mass at a given location in a gravitational field, then the gravitational force on an object with gravitational mass M is :

F = Mg \,

This is the basis by which masses are determined by weighing. In simple bathroom scales, for example, the force F is proportionate to the displacement of the spring beneath the weighing pan (see Hooke's law), and the scales are calibrated to take g into account, allowing the mass M to be read off.

Equivalence of inertial and gravitational masses

The equivalence of inertial and gravitational masses is sometimes referred to as the Galilean equivalence principle or weak equivalence principle. The most important consequence of this equivalence principle applies to freely falling objects. Suppose we have an object with inertial and gravitational masses m and M respectively. If the only force acting on the object comes from a gravitational field g, combining Newton's second law and the gravitational law yields the acceleration :

K = \frac g

This says that the ratio of gravitational to inertial mass of any object is equal to some constant K if and only if all objects fall at the same rate in a given gravitational field. This phenomenon is referred to as the universality of free-fall. (In addition, the constant K can be taken to be 1 by defining our units appropriately.) The first experiments demonstrating the universality of free-fall were conducted by Galileo. It is commonly stated that Galileo obtained his results by dropping objects from the Leaning Tower of Pisa, but this is unlikely to be true; actually, he performed his experiments with balls rolling down inclined planes. Increasingly precise experiments have been performed, such as those performed by Roland Eötvös, using the torsion balance pendulum, in 1889. To date, no deviation from universality, and thus from Galilean equivalence, has ever been found. More precise experimental efforts are still being carried out. It should be noted that the universality of free fall only applies to systems in which gravity is the only force acting. All other forces, especially friction and air resistance, must be absent or at least negligible. For example, if a hammer and a feather are dropped from the same height, we all know that the feather will take much longer to reach the ground. This happens because the feather is not really in free fall: the force of air resistance on it is about as strong as the force of gravity. On the other hand, if the experiment is performed in a vacuum, where there is no air resistance, the hammer and the feather should fall at the same rate and reach the ground together. This demonstration was, in fact, carried out in 1971 during the Apollo 15 Moon walk, by Commander David Scott. A stronger version of the equivalence principle, known as the Einstein equivalence principle or the strong equivalence principle, lies at the heart of the general theory of relativity. Einstein's equivalence principle states that it is impossible to distinguish between a uniform acceleration and a uniform gravitational field. Thus, the theory postulates that inertial and gravitational masses are fundamentally the same thing. All of the predictions of general relativity, such as the curvature of spacetime, are ultimately derived from this principle.

Relativistic relation among mass, energy and momentum

Special relativity is a necessary extension of classical physics. In particular, special relativity succeeds where classical mechanics fails badly in describing objects moving at speeds close to the speed of light. In relativistic mechanics, the mass (m) of a free particle is related to its energy (E) and momentum (p) by the equation :

\frac = m^2 c^2 + p^2

. where c is the speed of light. This is sometimes referred to as the mass-energy-momentum relation. The first thing to notice about this equation is that it can cope with massless objects (m = 0), for which it reduces to :

E = pc \,

In classical mechanics, massless objects are an ill-defined concept, since applying any force to one would produce, via Newton's second law, an infinite acceleration - a nonsensical result. In relativistic mechanics, they are objects that are always traveling at the speed of light; an example being light itself, in the form of photons. The above equation says that the energy carried by a massless object is directly proportional to its momentum. Let us now consider objects with non-zero mass. For these, the quantity m has a simple physical meaning: it is the inertial mass of the object as measured in its rest frame, the frame of reference in which its velocity is zero. (Note: massless objects do not possess a rest frame; they are moving at the speed of light in any frame of reference.) The way we would measure m is exactly the same as in classical mechanics, which we described above: bouncing it off a reference object and measuring the accelerations. As long as the velocity of each object remains much smaller than the speed of light during this procedure, relativistic corrections to classical mechanics will be utterly negligible. In the rest frame, the velocity is zero, and thus so is the momentum p. The mass-energy-momentum relation thus reduces to :

E = mc^2 \,

which states that the energy of an object as measured in its rest frame - its "rest energy" - is equal to its mass times the square of the speed of light. Some books follow this up by stating that "mass and energy are equivalent", but this is somewhat misleading. The mass of an object, as we have defined it, is a quantity intrinsic to the object, and independent of our current frame of reference. The energy E, on the other hand, varies with the frame of reference; if the frame is moving at a high velocity relative to the object, E will be very large, simply because the object has a lot of kinetic energy in that frame. Thus, E = mc² is not a "good" relativistic statement; it is true only in the rest frame of the object. Some authors define a quantity known as the relativistic mass, which is basically the quantity E/c². This makes the "equivalence" of "mass" and energy true by definition, though neither quantity is frame-independent! "Relativistic mass" was used in many early writings on relativity, and it is still used in books for laymen as well as introductory physics classes. However, the concept is downplayed or discouraged by many physicists nowadays, for reasons explained in the article on relativistic mass. Following the modern usage, whenever we refer to "mass" in this article we always mean the rest mass, unless otherwise identified. Having defined the mass of an object, let us look at how it behaves when not at rest. We can arrange the mass-energy-momentum relation in the following way: :

E = mc^2 \sqrt

When the momentum p is much smaller than mc, we can Taylor expand the square root, with the result :

E = mc^2 +  + \cdots

The leading term, which is the largest, is of course the rest energy. The object always has this minimum amount of energy, regardless of its momentum. The second term is the classical expression for the kinetic energy of the particle, and the higher-order terms are basically relativistic corrections for the kinetic energy. Under normal circumstances, the rest energy of an object is inaccessible, in the sense that it cannot be used to do mechanical work. When the object hits something, it can do work by transferring its momentum, and thus its kinetic energy, to whatever it hit. However, the rest energy depends only on the mass of the object, which does not change during collisions, so it cannot be transferred along with the kinetic energy. On the other hand, it is possible to access the rest energy using processes that split or combine particles. The reason is that mass, as we have defined it, is not conserved during such processes. The simplest example is the process of electron-positron annihilation, in which an electron and a positron annihilate each other to produce a pair of photons: the electron and positron both have non-zero mass, but the photons are massless. Other examples include nuclear fusion and nuclear fission. Metabolism, fire and other exothermic chemical processes also convert mass to energy, however the mass change from these is negligible. Energy, unlike mass, is always conserved in special relativity, so, roughly speaking, what is happening in these reactions is that the rest energy of the reactants is being transformed into the kinetic energy of the reaction products. The fact that rest energy can be liberated in this way is one of the most important predictions of special relativity.

References

- R.V. Eötvös et al, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 68 11 (1922)

External links

- [http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics Usenet Physics FAQ]
- [http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/mass.html Does mass change with velocity?]
- [http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/light_mass.html Does light have mass?]
- [http://www.teleles.nl/pdf/total_artikel.pdf Mass & energy]
- [http://www.geocities.com/physic1525/inertiaenergy.html The law of the inertia of the energy and the speed of the gravity. See chapter 3 The energy has mass ]
- [http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/stp/title.htm Dialog: Use and abuse of the concept of mass (from Spacetime physics by Edwin F. Taylor and John A. Wheeler)]
- [http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0111/0111134.pdf Photons, Clocks, Gravity and the Concept of Mass by L.B.Okun]
- [http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/lunar/apollo_15_feather_drop.html The Apollo 15 Hammer-Feather Drop]
- [http://calc.skyrocket.de/en/ Online Unit Converter - Conversion of many different units] Category:Physical chemistry Category:Classical mechanics
- ko:질량 ms:Jisim ja:質量 simple:Mass th:มวล

Mass (disambiguation)

Mass is a physical quantity related to an object's density and volume, and is a measure of the amount of matter in an object. Mass may also mean:
- Mass (liturgy), the primary worship service of some Christian churches.
- Mass (medicine), a tumor.
- Mass (music), a choral composition that sets the liturgical text to music.
- Mass (theatre), a 1971 musical play by Leonard Bernstein based upon the Roman Catholic liturgy.
- Mass (band), a post-punk band who recorded for the 4AD label.
- Mass, an adjective indicating a large quantity, as in mass murder, mass suicide, mass hysteria, or weapons of mass destruction
- Mass, an alias of electronic musician Peter Harris
- Mass., an abbreviation for Massachusetts

Matter

Matter is commonly referred to as the substance of which physical objects are composed. In physics, it is everything that is constituted of elementary fermions. Philosophically, matter constitutes the formless substratum of all things, which exists only potentially and from which reality is produced. In the sense of content, matter is also used in contrast to form.

Matter in physics

Matter occupies space and has mass. It is composed predominantly of atoms, which consist of protons, neutrons, and electrons. All gauge bosons (of which the photon is one), which mediate the four fundamental forces, are not considered matter, even though they certainly have energy and some also mass. Matter thus consists of quarks and leptons. There are six types of quarks (strange, charm, top, bottom, up, and down) which combine to form hadrons, primarily baryons and mesons, through the strong interaction and are actually thought to always be confined. Among the baryons are the proton and the neutron, which further combine to form the nuclei of all elements of the periodic table. Usually these nuclei are surrounded by a cloud of electrons. A nucleus with as many electrons as protons, which is thus electrically neutral, is called an atom, otherwise it is an ion. Chemistry is the science that studies how nuclei and electrons combine to form compounds. In bulk, matter can exist in several different phases, according to particle density and energy density or alternatively pressure and temperature. These phases include gases, plasmas, liquids, fluids, superfluids, solids, and Bose-Einstein condensate. As circumstances change, matter may change from one phase into another. These phenomena are called phase transitions, and their energetics are studied in the field of thermodynamics. In small quantities, matter can exhibit properties that are entirely different from those of bulk material. Homogeneous matter has a definite composition and properties and any amount of the matter has the same composition and properties. Homogenous matter may or may not be a mixture. Iron and brass would examples of each. Heterogeneous matter does not have a definite composition, for example, granite. Matter constitutes the observable Universe. It can be converted to energy (see annihilation), and vice versa - can be created out of energy (see matter creation) and undergo other formations and alterations.

Force

:For other senses of this word, see force (disambiguation). In physics, a force is an external cause responsible for any change of a physical system. For instance, a person holding a dog by a rope is experiencing the force applied by the rope on their hand, and the cause for its pulling forward is the force exercised by the rope. The kinetic expression of this change is, according to Newton's second law, acceleration, non kinetic expressions such as deformation can also occur. The SI unit for force is the newton.

Elementary concepts

Force in its most primitive definition can be thought of as that which when acting alone causes an object to accelerate. In a practical sense forces can be divided into two groups: contact forces and field forces. Contact forces require the physical contact of one object with other such as a hammer striking a nail or the force exerted by a gas under pressure - gas produced by exploding gunpowder forces a heavy ball out of a cannon. Field forces on the other hand need no physical medium of contact. Gravity and magnetism are examples of such forces. It should be noted however, that fundamentally all forces are in fact field forces. The force of hammer striking the nail in the previous example turns out to be a clash of the electric forces in both hammer and nail. Nevertheless it is appropriate in some cases to maintain these two classifications for ease of understanding.

Quantitative definition

In physics models, the point-like system is used, where objects are represented as one-dimensional points at their centre of mass. The only change the system can experience is a change of its momentum (its speed). Since the rise of the atomic theory, any physical system has been considered in classical physics as composed of point-like systems called atoms or molecules. Therefore, all forces can be defined by their effect; that is, by the change of movement they induce on point-like systems. This change of movement can be quantified by the acceleration (the derivative of velocity). The discovery by Isaac Newton that a given force will induce an acceleration in inverse proportion to a quantity called the mass of inertia or inertial mass which is independent of the speed of the system is Newton's second law. This law allows us to predict the effect of a force on any point-like system whose mass is known. It is usually written as: :F = dp/dt = d(m·v)/dt = m·a (in the case where m does not depend on t) where :F is the force (a vector quantity), :p is the momentum, :t is the time, :v is the velocity, :m is the mass, and :a=d²x/dt² is the acceleration, the second derivative with respect to t of the position vector x. If the mass m is measured in kilograms and the acceleration a is measured in metres per second squared, then the unit of force is kilogram × metre/second squared. This unit is called the newton: 1 N = 1 kg x 1 m/s². This equation is a system of three second-order differential equations with respect to the three-dimensional position vector which is an unknown function of time. This equation can be solved if F is a known function of x and some of its derivatives and if the mass m is known. Morevover the boundary conditions are required; for example, the values of the position vector and x and the velocity v at the starting time, say t=0. Of course, this formula is only useful if one knows the numerical values of F and m. The definition above is an implicit definition, arrived at as follows. One defines a reference system (one litre of water) and a reference force (the gravitational force applied by the Earth on it at the altitude of Paris). One takes Newton's second law for granted (one postulates that it is true) and measures the acceleration induced by the reference force on the reference system. This gives us a mass unit (1 kg) and a force unit (the older unit of 1 kilogram-force = 9.81 N). Once this is done, one can measure any force by the acceleration it induces on the reference system and measure the inertial mass of any system by measuring the acceleration induced on this system by the reference force. Force is often considered a fundamental quantity in physics, but there are more fundamental quantities, such as momentum (p = mass m x velocity v). Energy, measured in joules, is still less fundamental than force and momentum, because it is defined as work, and work is defined in terms of force. The two most fundamental theories of nature - quantum electrodynamics and general relativity - do not contain the concept of force at all. Although not the most fundamental quantity in physics, force is an important basic mathematical concept from which other concepts, such work and pressure (measured in pascals), are derived. Force is sometimes confused with stress.

Types of force

There are four known fundamental forces in nature.
- Nuclear forces acting between subatomic particles
- Electromagnetic forces between electric charges
- Weak forces arising from radioactive decay
- Gravitational forces between masses Quantum field theory accurately models the first three fundamental forces, but does not model quantum gravity. Quantum gravity on a large scale can, however, be described by general relativity. The four fundamental forces describe every observable phenomenon including the many other forces observed such as: Coulomb's force (the force between electrical charges), gravitational force (force between masses), magnetic force, frictional forces, centripetal, centrifugal, impact force, and spring force, to name a few. Forces can also be classified into conservative forces and nonconservative forces. Conservative forces are equivalent to the gradient of a potential, and include gravity, electromagnetic force, and spring force. Nonconservative forces include friction and drag.

Properties of force

Because momentum is a vector, then force, being its time derivative, is also a vector - it has magnitude and direction. Forces can be added together using the parallelogram of force. When two forces act on an object, the resulting force, the resultant, is the vector sum of the original forces. This is called the principle of superposition. The magnitude of the resultant varies from zero to the sum of the magnitudes of the two forces, depending on the angle between their lines of action. If the two forces are equal, but opposite, the resultant is zero. This condition is called static equilibrium, with the result that the object remains at rest or moves with a constant velocity. As well as being added, forces can be can also be broken down (or 'resolved'). For example, a horizontal force pointing northeast can be split into two forces, one pointing north, and one pointing east. Summing these component forces using vector addition yields the original force. Force vectors can also be three-dimensional, with the third (vertical) component at right-angles to the two horizontal components.

Forces in theory

The total (Newtonian) force, in newtons, on an object at any given time is defined as the rate of change of the object's velocity multiplied by the object's mass: :

\mathbf = \lim_ \frac

where :m is the inertial mass of the particle (measured in kilograms) :v_o is its initial velocity (measured in metres per second) :v is its final velocity (measured in metres per second) :T is the time from the initial state to the final state (measured in seconds); :Lim T→0 is the limit as T tends towards zero. Force was so defined to explain the effects of superimposing situations: if in one situation, a force is experienced by a particle, and if in another situation another force is experienced by that particle, then in a third situation, which (according to standard physical practice) is taken to be a combination of the two individual situations, the force experienced by the particle will be the vector sum of the individual forces experienced in the first two situations. This superposition of forces, and the definition of inertial frames and inertial mass, are the empirical content of Newton's laws of motion. There are other ways to look at the above definition of force. First, the mass of a body multiplied by its velocity is called its momentum, p, so the above definition is equivalent to: :

\textbf=

If F is not constant over Δt, then this is the definition of average force over the time interval. To apply it at an instant we apply an idea from calculus. If we graph p as a function of time, the average force will be the slope of the line connecting the momentum at two times. Taking the limit as the two times get closer together gives the slope at an instant, which is called the derivative: :

\textbf=

Many forces are associated with a potential energy field. For instance, the gravitational force acting upon a body can be seen as the action of the gravitational field that is present at the body's location. The potential field is defined as that field whose gradient is equal and opposite to the force produced at every point: :

\textbf=-\nabla U

The derivative of force with respect to time is called yank. Higher order derivatives are sometimes used, but they lack names because of their rarity. In most explanations of mechanics, force is usually defined only implicitly, in terms of the equations that work with it. Some physicists, philosophers and mathematicians, such as Ernst Mach, Clifford Truesdell and Walter Noll, have found this problematic and sought a more explicit definition of force. According to the Special theory of relativity the mass of an object increases as it's velocity and therefore it's energy increases. The law of force must then be modified to the following: :

\textbf=

where :v is the mass's velocity :c is the speed of light. Note that the equation is undefined if the mass's speed is equal to c because one then has to divide by zero. This is one reason most physicists believe an object with nonzero rest mass can not be accelerated to the speed of light, as this would require an infinite force.

Units of measurement

The SI unit used to measure force is the newton (symbol N), which is equivalent to kg·m·s⁻².

Non-SI units of force and mass

The F=m·a relationship can be used with any consistent units (SI or CGS). If these units are not consistent, a more general form, F=k·m·a, can be used, where the constant k is a conversion factor dependent upon the units being used. For example, in imperial engineering units, F is measured in "pounds force" or "lbf", m in "pounds mass" or "lb", and a in feet per second squared. In this particular system, one needs to use the more general form above, usually written F=m·a/g_c with the constant normally used for this purpose g_c = 32.174 lb·ft/(lbf·s²) equal to the reciprocal of the k above. As with the kilogram, the pound is colloquially used as both a unit of mass and a unit of force. 1 lbf is the force required to accelerate 1 lb at 32.174 ft per second squared, since 32.174 ft per second squared is the standard acceleration due to terrestrial gravity. Another imperial unit of mass is the slug, defined as 32.174 lb. It is the mass that accelerates by one foot per second squared when a force of one lbf is exerted on it. When the standard gee (an acceleration of 9.80665 m/s²) is used to define pounds force, the mass in pounds is numerically equal to the weight in pounds force. However, even at sea level on Earth, the actual acceleration of free fall is quite variable, over 0.53% more at the poles than at the equator. Thus, a mass of 1.0000 lb at sea level at the equator exerts a force due to gravity of 0.9973 lbf, whereas a mass of 1.000 lb at sea level at the poles exerts a force due to gravity of 1.0026 lbf. The normal average sea level acceleration on Earth (World Gravity Formula 1980) is 9.79764 m/s², so on average at sea level on Earth, 1.0000 lb will exerts a force of 0.9991 lbf. The equivalence 1 lb = 0.453 592 37 kg is always true, by definition, anywhere in the universe. If you use the standard gee which is official for defining kilograms force to define pounds force as well, then the same relationship will hold between pounds-force and kilograms-force (an old non-SI unit is still used). If a different value is used to define pounds force, then the relationship to kilograms force will be slightly different—but in any case, that relationship is also a constant anywhere in the universe. What is not constant throughout the universe is the amount of force in terms of pounds-force (or any other force units) which 1 lb will exert due to gravity. By analogy with the slug, there is a rarely used unit of mass called the "metric slug". This is the mass that accelerates at one metre per second squared when pushed by a force of one kgf. An item with a mass of 10 kg has a mass of 1.01972661 metric slugs (= 10 kg divided by 9.80665 kg per metric slug). This unit is also known by various other names such as the hyl, TME (from a German acronym), and mug (from metric slug). Another unit of force called the poundal (pdl) is defined as the force that accelerates 1 lbm at 1 foot per second squared. Given that 1 lbf = 32.174 lb times one foot per second squared, we have 1 lbf = 32.174 pdl. The kilogram-force is a unit of force that was used in various fields of science and technology. In 1901, the CGPM improved the definition of the kilogram-force, adopting a standard acceleration of gravity for the purpose, and making the kilogram-force equal to the force exerted by a mass of 1 kg when accelerated by 9.80665 m/s². The kilogram-force is not a part of the modern SI system, but is still used in applications such as:
- Thrust of jet and rocket engines
- Spoke tension of bicycles
- Draw weight of bows
- Torque wrenches in units such as "meter kilograms" or "kilogram centimetres" (the kilograms are rarely identified as units of force)
- Engine torque output (kgf·m expressed in various word orders, spellings, and symbols)
- Pressure gauges in "kg/cm²" or "kgf/cm²" In colloquial, non-scientific usage, the "kilograms" used for "weight" are almost always the proper SI units for this purpose. They are units of mass, not units of force. The symbol "kgm" for kilograms is also sometimes encountered. This might occasionally be an attempt to disintinguish kilograms as units of mass from the "kgf" symbol for the units of force. It might also be used as a symbol for those obsolete torque units (kilogram-force metres) mentioned above, used without properly separating the units for kilogram and metre with either a space or a centered dot.

Conversions

Below are several coversion factors between various mesurements of force:
- 1 kgf (kilopond kp) = 9.80665 newtons
- 1 metric slug = 9.80665 kg
- 1 lbf = 32.174 poundals
- 1 slug = 32.174 lb
- 1 kgf = 2.2046 lbf

Forces in everyday life

Forces are part of everyday life, with examples such as:
- gravity: objects fall, even after being thrown upwards, or slide and roll down
- friction: floors and objects that are not extremely slippery
- spring force, objects resist tensile stress, compressive stress and/or shear stress, objects bounce back.
- electromagnetic force: attraction of magnets
- movement created by force: the movement of objects when force is applied.

Forces in the laboratory

Founding experiments

- Galileo Galilei used rolling balls to disprove the Aristotelian theory of motion (1602 - 1607)
- Henry Cavendish's torsion bar experiment measured the force of gravity between two masses (1798)

Instruments to measure forces

- spring balance
- pivot balance
- forcemeter

History

Force was first described by Archimedes.

References

-
-
-

External links

- [http://jumk.de/calc/force.shtml Calculation: force F - English and American units to metric units]
- [http://calc.skyrocket.de/en/ Online Unit Converter - Conversion of many different units]
- [http://www.patbelford.com/gallery/web3d/education/forceworkpower/index.html Interactive demonstration of Force-Work-Power Relationship] Category:Introductory physics ko:힘 ms:Daya (fizik) ja:力 simple:Force (physics)

Gravitational field

Gravity is the force of attraction between massive particles. Weight is determined by the mass of an object and its location in a gravitational field. While a great deal is known about the properties of gravity, the ultimate cause of the gravitational force remains an open question. General relativity is the most successful theory of gravitation to date. It postulates that mass and energy curve space-time, resulting in the phenomenon known as gravity. The effect of the bending of spacetime is often misunderstood as most people seem to prefer to think of a falling object as accelerating when the facts do not support that assumption. Skydivers do not feel any acceleration (other than from wind resistance). Gravity is acceleration.

F=\dot=m\dot+\dotv\,\!

means (if the mass is unvarying) that there must be a force that causes a mass to accelerate. For a rocket ship, that is the rocket engine. For the earth, it is the compression of the mass between something on the surface of the earth and the earth's center of mass. The acceleration is in relation to spacetime in that the weight one feels is one's resistance to deviating from one's path in spacetime. The same holds true in the rocket ship except that a rocket engine supplies the force to accelerate an occupant from his spacetime path. There is no difference between the weight he feels because of gravity or the rocket.

Newton's law of universal gravitation

Newton's law of universal gravitation states the following: :Every object in the Universe attracts every other object with a force directed along the line of centers of mass for the two objects. This force is proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the separation between the centers of mass of the two objects. Given that the force is along the line through the two masses, the law can be stated symbolically as follows. :

F = - G \frac

where: :F is the magnitude of the (repulsive) gravitational force between two objects :G is the gravitational constant, that is approximately : G = 6.67 × 10⁻¹¹ N m² kg^-2 :m₁ is the mass of first object :m₂ is the mass of second object :r is the distance between the objects It can be seen that this repulsive force F is always negative, and this means that the net attractive force is positive. The minus sign is used to hold the same value meaning as in the Coulomb's Law, where a positive force as result means repulsion between two charges. Thus gravity is proportional to the mass of each object, but has an inverse square relationship with the distance between the centres of each mass. Strictly speaking, this law applies only to point-like objects. If the objects have spatial extent, the force has to be calculated by integrating the force (in vector form, see below) over the extents of the two bodies. It can be shown that for an object with a spherically-symmetric distribution of mass, the integral gives the same gravitational attraction on masses outside it as if the object were a point mass.¹ This law of universal gravitation was originally formulated by Isaac Newton in his work, the Principia Mathematica (1687). Professor William Whewell of Cambridge University, author of History of the Inductive Sciences (1837) stated: ::The law of gravitation is indisputably and incomparably the greatest scientific discovery ever made, whether we look at the advance which it involved, the extent of the truth disclosed, or the fundamental and satisfactory nature of this truth. [In A Treasury of Science ed. Harlow Shapley et al, Harper & Bros. NY: 1946] The history of gravitation as a physical concept is considered in more detail below.

Vector form

below Newton's law of universal gravitation can be written as a vector equation to account for the direction of the gravitational force as well as its magnitude. In this formula, quantities in bold represent vectors. :

\mathbf_ =
 G 
 \, \mathbf_

\mathbf_ =
 - G 
 \, \mathbf_

where :F₁₂ is the force on object 1 due to object 2 :G is the gravitational constant :m₁ and m₂ are the masses of the objects 1 and 2 :r₂₁ = | r₂ − r₁ | is the distance between objects 2 and 1 :

\mathbf_ \equiv \frac

is the unit vector from object 2 to 1 It can be seen, that the vector form of the equation is the same as the scalar form, except for the vector value of F and the unit vector. Also, it can be seen that F₁₂ = − F₂₁. Gravitational acceleration is given by the same formula except for one of the factors m: :

\mathbf =
  G 
  \, \mathbf

Gravitational field

The gravitational field is a vector field that describes the gravitational force an object of given mass experiences in any given place in space. It is a generalization of the vector form, which becomes particularly useful if more than 2 objects are involved (such as a rocket between the Earth and the Moon). For 2 objects (e.g. object 1 is a rocket, object 2 the Earth), we simply write

\mathbf r

instead of

\mathbf r_

and

m

instead of

m_1

and define the gravitational field

\mathbf g(\mathbf r)

as: :

\mathbf g(\mathbf r) =
 G 
 \, \mathbf

so that we can write: :

\mathbf( \mathbf r) = m \mathbf g(\mathbf r)

This formulation is independent of the objects causing the field. The field has units of force divided by mass; in SI, this is N·kg⁻¹.

Problems with Newton's theory

Although Newton's formulation of gravitation is quite accurate for most practical purposes, it has a few problems:

Theoretical concerns

- There is no prospect of identifying the mediator of gravity. Newton himself felt the inexplicable action at a distance to be unsatisfactory (see "Newton's reservations" below).
- Newton's theory requires that gravitational force is transmitted instantaneously. Given classical assumptions of the nature of space and time, this is necessary to preserve the conservation of angular momentum observed by Johannes Kepler. However, it is in direct conflict with Einstein's theory of special relativity which places an upper limit—the speed of light in vacuum—on the velocity at which signals can be transmitted.

Disagreement with observation

- Newton's theory does not fully explain the precession of the perihelion of the orbit of the planet Mercury. There is a 43 arcsecond per century discrepancy between the Newtonian prediction (resulting from the gravitational tugs of the other planets) and the observed precession.
- The predicted deflection of light by gravity is only half as much as observations of this deflection, which were made after General Relativity was developed in 1915.
- The observed fact that gravitational and inertial masses are the same for all bodies is unexplained within Newton's system. General relativity takes this as a postulate. See equivalence principle.

Newton's reservations

It's important to understand that while Newton was able to formulate his law of gravity in his monumental work, he was deeply uncomfortable with the notion of "action at a distance" which his equations implied. He never, in his words, "assigned the cause of this power". In all other cases, he used the phenomenon of motion to explain the origin of various forces acting on bodies, but in the case of gravity, he was unable to experimentally identify the motion that produces the force of gravity. Moreover, he refused to even offer a hypothesis as to the cause of this force on grounds that to do so was contrary to sound science. He lamented the fact that "philosophers have hitherto attempted the search of nature in vain" for the source of the gravitational force, as he was convinced "by many reasons" that there were "causes hitherto unknown" that were fundamental to all the "phenomena of nature". These fundamental phenomena are still under investigation and, though hypotheses abound, the definitive answer is yet to be found. While it is true that Einstein's hypotheses are successful in explaining the effects of gravitational forces more precisely than Newton's in certain cases, he too never assigned the cause of this power, in his theories. It is said that in Einstein's equations, "matter tells space how to curve, and space tells matter how to move", but this new idea, completely foreign to the world of Newton, does not enable Einstein to assign the "cause of this power" to curve space any more than the Law of Universal Gravitation enabled Newton to assign its cause. In Newton's own words: :I wish we could derive the rest of the phenomena of nature by the same kind of reasoning from mechanical principles; for I am induced by many reasons to suspect that they may all depend upon certain forces by which the particles of bodies, by some causes hitherto unknown, are either mutually impelled towards each other, and cohere in regular figures, or are repelled and recede from each other; which forces being unknown, philosophers have hitherto attempted the search of nature in vain. If science is eventually able to discover the cause of the gravitational force, Newton's wish could eventually be fulfilled as well. It should be noted that here, the word "cause" is not being used in the same sense as "cause and effect" or "the defendant caused the victim to die". Rather, when Newton uses the word "cause," he (apparently) is referring to an "explanation". In other words, a phrase like "Newtonian gravity is the cause of planetary motion" means simply that Newtonian gravity explains the motion of the planets. See Causality and Causality (physics).

Einstein's theory of gravitation

Einstein's theory of gravitation answered the problems with Newton's theory noted above. In a revolutionary move, his theory of general relativity (1915) stated that the presence of mass, energy, and momentum causes spacetime to become curved. Because of this curvature, the paths that objects in inertial motion follow can "deviate" or change direction over time. This deviation appears to us as an acceleration towards massive objects, which Newton characterized as being gravity. In general relativity however, this acceleration or free fall is actually inertial motion. So objects in a gravitational field appear to fall at the same rate due to their being in inertial motion while the observer is the one being accelerated. (This identification of free fall and inertia is known as the Equivalence principle.) The relationship between the presence of mass/energy/momentum and the curvature of spacetime is given by the Einstein field equations. The actual shapes of spacetime are described by solutions of the Einstein field equations. In particular, the Schwarzschild solution (1916) describes the gravitational field around a spherically symmetric massive object. The geodesics of the Schwarzschild solution describe the observed behavior of objects being acted on gravitationally, including the anomalous perihelion precession of Mercury and the bending of light as it passes the Sun. Arthur Eddington found observational evidence for the bending of light passing the Sun as predicted by general relativity in 1919. Subsequent observations have confirmed Eddington's results, and observations of a pulsar which is occulted by the Sun every year have permitted this confirmation to be done to a high degree of accuracy. There have also in the years since 1919 been numerous other tests of general relativity, all of which have confirmed Einstein's theory.

Units of measurement and variations in gravity

tests of general relativity. (ESA image)]] Gravitational phenomena are measured in various units, depending on the purpose. The gravitational constant is measured in newtons times metre squared per kilogram squared. Gravitational acceleration, and acceleration in general, is measured in metres per second squared or in non-SI units such as galileos, gees, or feet per second squared. The acceleration due to gravity at the Earth's surface is approximately 9.81 m/s², more precise values depending on the location. A standard value of the Earth's gravitational acceleration has been adopted, called g_n. When the typical range of interesting values is from zero to tens of metres per second squared, as in aircraft, acceleration is often stated in multiples of g_n. When used as a measurement unit, the standard acceleration is often called "gee", as g can be mistaken for g, the gram symbol. For other purposes, measurements in millimetres or micrometres per second squared (mm/s² or µm/s²) or in multiples of milligals or milligalileos (1 mGal = 1/1000 Gal), a non-SI unit still common in some fields such as geophysics. A related unit is the eotvos, which is a cgs unit of the gravitational gradient. Mountains and other geological features cause subtle variations in the Earth's gravitational field; the magnitude of the variation per unit distance is measured in inverse seconds squared or in eotvoses. Typical variations with time are 2 µm/s² (0.2 mGal) during a day, due to the tides, i.e. the gravity due to the Moon and the Sun. A larger variation in the effect of gravity occurs when we move from the equator to the poles. The effective force of gravity decreases as the distance from the equator decreases, due to the rotation of the Earth, and the resulting centrifugal force and flattening of the Earth. The centrifugal force causes an effective force 'up' which effectively counteracts gravity, while the flattening of the Earth causes the poles to be closer to the center of mass of the Earth. It is also related to the fact that the Earth's density changes from the surface of the planet to its centre. The sea-level gravitational acceleration is 9.780 m/s² at the equator and 9.832 m/s² at the poles, so an object will exert about 0.5% more force due to gravity at sea level at the poles than at sea level at the equator [http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=310].

Comparison with electromagnetic force

The gravitational interaction of protons is approximately a factor 10³⁶ weaker than the electromagnetic repulsion. This factor is independent of distance, because both interactions are inversely proportional to the square of the distance. Therefore on an atomic scale mutual gravity is negligible. However, the main interaction between common objects and the Earth and between celestial bodies is gravity, because at this scale matter is electrically neutral: even if in both bodies there were a surplus or deficit of only one electron for every 10¹⁸ protons and neutrons this would already be enough to cancel gravity (or in the case of a surplus in one and a deficit in the other: double the interaction). However, the main interactions between the charged particles in cosmic plasma (that makes up over 99% of the universe by volume), are electromagnetic forces. In terms of Planck units: the charge of a proton is 0.085, while the mass is only . From that point of view, the gravitational force is not small as such, but because masses are small. The relative weakness of gravity can be demonstrated with a small magnet picking up pieces of iron. The small magnet is able to overwhelm the gravitational interaction of the entire Earth. Similarly, when doing a chin-up, the electromagnetic interaction within your muscle cells is able to overcome the force induced by Earth on your entire body. Gravity is small unless at least one of the two bodies is large or one body is very dense and the other is close by, but the small gravitational interaction exerted by bodies of ordinary size can fairly easily be detected through experiments such as the Cavendish torsion bar experiment. Cavendish torsion bar experiment Further reading
- Jefimenko, Oleg D., "Causality, electromagnetic induction, and gravitation : a different approach to the theory of electromagnetic and gravitational fields". Star City [West Virginia] : Electret Scientific Co., c1992. ISBN 0917406095
- Heaviside, Oliver, "[http://www.as.wvu.edu/coll03/phys/www/Heavisid.htm A gravitational and electromagnetic analogy]". The Electrician, 1893.

Gravity and quantum mechanics

It is strongly believed that three of the four fundamental forces (the strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, and the electromagnetic force) are manifestations of a single, more fundamental force. Combining gravity with these forces of quantum mechanics to create a theory of quantum gravity is currently an important topic of research amongst physicists. General relativity is essentially a geometric theory of gravity. Quantum mechanics relies on interactions between particles, but general relativity requires no exchange of particles in its explanation of gravity. Scientists have theorized about the graviton (a messenger particle that transmits the force of gravity) for years, but have been frustrated in their attempts to find a consistent quantum theory for it. Many believe that string theory holds a great deal of promise to unify general relativity and quantum mechanics, but this promise has yet to be realized. It is notable that in general relativity gravitational radiation (which under the rules of quantum mechanics must be composed of gravitons) is only created in situations where the curvature of spacetime is oscillating, such as for co-orbiting objects. The amount of gravitational radiation emitted by the solar system and its planetary systems is far too small to measure. However, gravitational radiation has been indirectly observed as an energy loss over time in binary pulsar systems such as PSR1913+16). It is believed that neutron star mergers and black hole formation may create detectable amounts of gravitational radiation. Gravitational radiation observatories such as LIGO have been created to study the problem. No confirmed detections have been made of this hypothetical radiation, but as the science behind LIGO is refined and as the instruments themselves are endowed with greater sensitivity over the next decade, this may change.

Experimental tests of theories

Today General Relativity is accepted as the standard description of gravitational phenomena. (Alternative theories of gravitation exist but are more complicated than General Relativity.) General Relativity is consistent with all currently available measurements of large-scale phenomena. For weak gravitational fields and bodies moving at slow speeds at small distances, Einstein's General Relativity gives almost exactly the same predictions as Newton's law of gravitation. Crucial experiments that justified the adoption of General Relativity over Newtonian gravity were the classical tests: the gravitational redshift, the deflection of light rays by the Sun, and the precession of the orbit of Mercury. More recent experimental confirmations of General Relativity were the (indirect) deduction of gravitational waves being emitted from orbiting binary stars, the existence of neutron stars and black holes, gravitational lensing, and the convergence of measurements in observational cosmology to an approximately flat model of the observable Universe, with a matter density parameter of approximately 30% of the critical density and a cosmological constant of approximately 70% of the critical density. The equivalence principle, the postulate of general relativity that presumes that inertial mass and gravitational mass are the same, is also under test. Past, present, and future tests are discussed in the equivalence principle section. Even to this day, scientists try to challenge General Relativity with more and more precise direct experiments. The goal of these tests is to shed light on the yet unknown relationship between Gravity and Quantum Mechanics. Space probes are used to either make very sensitive measurements over large distances, or to bring the instruments into an environment that is much more controlled than it could be on Earth. For example, in 2004 a dedicated satellite for gravity experiments, called Gravity Probe B, was launched to test general relativity's predicted frame-dragging effect, among others. Also, land-based experiments like LIGO and a host of "bar detectors" are trying to detect gravitational waves directly. A space-based hunt for gravitational waves, LISA, is in its early stages. It should be sensitive to low frequency gravitational waves from many sources, perhaps including the Big Bang. Speed of gravity: Einstein's theory of relativity predicts that the speed of gravity (defined as the speed at which changes in location of a mass are propagated to other masses) should be consistent with the speed of light. In 2002, the Fomalont-Kopeikin experiment produced measurements of the speed of gravity which matched this prediction. However, this experiment has not yet been widely peer-reviewed, and is facing criticism from those who claim that Fomalont-Kopeikin did nothing more than measure the speed of light in a convoluted manner. The Pioneer anomaly is an empirical observation that the positions of the Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11 space probes differ very slightly from what would be expected according to known effects (gravitational or otherwise). The possibility of new physics has not been ruled out, despite very thorough investigation in search of a more prosaic explanation.

Recent Alternative theories

- Brans-Dicke theory of gravity
- Rosen bi-metric theory of gravity
- In the modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND), Mordehai Milgrom proposes a modification of Newton's Second Law of motion for small accelerations.

Historical Alternative theories

- Nikola Tesla challenged Albert Einstein's theory of relativity, announcing he was working on a Dynamic theory of gravity (which began between 1892 and 1894) and argued that a "field of force" was a better concept and focused on media with electromagnetic energy that fill all of space.
- In 1967 Andrei Sakharov proposed something similar, if not essentially identical. His theory has been adopted and promoted by Messrs. Haisch, Rueda and Puthoff who, among other things, explain that gravitational and inertial mass are identical and that high speed rotation can reduce (relative) mass. Combining these notions with those of T. T. Brown, it is relatively easy to conceive how field propulsion vehicles such as "flying saucers" could be engineered given a suitable source of power.
- Georges-Louis LeSage proposed a gravity mechanism, now commonly called LeSage gravity, based on a fluid-based explanation where a light gas fills the entire universe.

Self-gravitating system

A self-gravitating system is a system of masses kept together by mutual gravity. An example is a binary star.

Special applications of gravity

A height difference can provide a useful pressure in a liquid, as in the case of an intravenous drip or a water tower, and can even supply enough power for hydroelectricity. A weight hanging from a cable over a pulley provides a constant tension in the cable, also in the part on the other side of the pulley. pulley Dubuque, Iowa]] Molten lead, when poured into the top of a shot tower, will coalesce into a rain of spherical lead shot, first separating into droplets, forming molten spheres, and finally freezing solid, undergoing many of the same effects as meteoritic tektites, which will cool into spherical, or near-spherical shapes in free-fall. A fractionation tower can be used to manufacture some materials by separating out the material components based on their specific gravity.

Comparative gravities of different planets and Earth's moon

The standard acceleration due to gravity at the Earth's surface is, by convention, equal to 9.80665 metres per second squared. (The local acceleration of gravity varies slightly over the surface of the Earth; see gee for details.) This quantity is known variously as g_n, g_e (sometimes this is the normal equatorial value on Earth, 9.78033 m/s²), g₀, gee, or simply g (which is also used for the variable local value). The following is a list of the gravitational accelerations (in multiples of g) at the Sun, the surfaces of each of the planets in the solar system, and the Earth's moon : Note: The "surface" is taken to mean the cloud tops of the gas giants (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune) in the above table. It is usually specified as the location where the pressure is equal to a certain value (normally 75 kPa?). For the Sun, the "surface" is taken to mean the photosphere. Within the Earth, the gravitational field peaks at the core-mantle boundary, where it has a value of 10.7 m/s². For spherical bodies surface gravity in m/s² is 2.8 × 10⁻¹⁰ times the radius in m times the average density in kg/m³. When flying from Earth to Mars, climbing against the field of the Earth at the start is 100 000 times heavier than climbing against the force of the sun for the rest of the flight.

Mathematical equations for a falling body

These equations describe the motion of a falling body under acceleration g near the surface of the Earth. mantle Here, the acceleration of gravity is a constant, g, because in the vector equation above,

_

would be a constant vector, pointing straight down. In this case, Newton's law of gravitation simplifies to the law :F = mg The following equations ignore air resistance and the rotation of the Earth, but are usually accurate enough for heights not exceeding the tallest man-made structures. They fail to describe the Coriolis effect, for example. They are extremely accurate on the surface of the Moon, where the atmosphere is almost nil. Astronaut David Scott demonstrated this with a hammer and a feather. Galileo was the first to demonstrate and then formulate these equations. He used a ramp to study rolling balls, effectively slowing down the acceleration enough so that he could measure the time as the ball rolled down a known distance down the ramp. He used a water clock to measure the time; by using an "extremely accurate balance" to measure the amount of water, he could measure the time elapsed. ² :For Earth

\ g=9.8\, \mbox/\mbox^2 \quad

For other planets, multiply

\ g

by the ratio of the gravitational accelerations shown above. Note: "Average" means average in time. Note: Distance traveled, d, and time taken, t, must be in the same system of units as acceleration g. See dimensional analysis. To convert metres per second to kilometres per hour (km/h) multiply by 3.6, and to convert feet per second to miles per hour (mph) multiply by 0.68 (or, precisely, 15/22).

Gravitational potential

For any mass distribution there is a scalar field, the gravitational potential (a scalar potential), which is the gravitational potential energy per unit mass of a point mass, as function of position. It is

- G \int dm

where the integral is taken over all mass. Minus its gradient is the gravity field itself, and minus its Laplacian is the divergence of the gravity field, which is everywhere equal to -4πG times the local density. Thus when outside masses the potential satisfies Laplace's equation (i.e., the potential is a harmonic function), and when inside masses the potential satisfies Poisson's equation with, as right-hand side, 4πG times the local density.

Acceleration relative to the rotating Earth

The acceleration measured on the rotating surface of the Earth is not quite the same as the acceleration that is measured for a free-falling body because of the centrifugal force. In other words, the apparent acceleration in the rotating frame of reference is the total gravity vector minus a small vector toward the north-south axis of the Earth, corresponding to staying stationary in that frame reference.

History of gravitational theory

The first mathematical formulation of gravity was published in 1687 by Sir Isaac Newton. His law of universal gravitation was the standard theory of gravity until work by Albert Einstein and others on general relativity. Since calculations in general relativity are complicated, and Newtonian gravity is sufficiently accurate for calculations involving weak gravitational fields (e.g., launching rockets, projectiles, pendulums, etc.), Newton's formulae are generally preferred. Although the law of universal gravitation was first clearly and rigorously formulated by Isaac Newton, the phenomenon was observed and recorded by others. Even Ptolemy had a vague conception of a force tending toward the center of the Earth which not only kept bodies upon its surface, but in some way upheld the order of the universe. Johannes Kepler inferred that the planets move in their orbits under some influence or force exerted by the Sun; but the laws of motion were not then sufficiently developed, nor were Kepler's ideas of force sufficiently clear, to make a precise statement of the nature of the force. Christiaan Huygens and Robert Hooke, contemporaries of Newton, saw that Kepler's third law implied a force which varied inversely as the square of the distance. Newton's conceptual advance was to understand that the same force that causes a thrown rock to fall back to the Earth keeps the planets in orbit around the Sun, and the Moon in orbit around the Earth. Newton was not alone in making significant contributions to the understanding of gravity. Before Newton, Galileo Galilei corrected a common misconception, started by Aristotle, that objects with different mass fall at different rates. To Aristotle, it simply made sense that objects of different mass would fall at different rates, and that was enough for him. Galileo, however, actually tried dropping objects of different mass at the same time. Aside from differences due to friction from the air, Galileo observed that all masses accelerate the same. Using Newton's equation,

F = m a

, it is plain to us why: :

F = - = m_1a_1

The above equation says that mass

m_1

will accelerate at acceleration

a_1

under the force of gravity, but divide both sides of the equation by

m_1

and: :

a_1 =

Nowhere in the above equation does the mass of the falling body appear. When dealing with objects near the surface of a planet, the change in r divided by the initial r is so small that the acceleration due to gravity appears to be perfectly constant. The acceleration due to gravity on Earth is usually called g, and its value is about 9.82 m/s². Galileo didn't have Newton's equations, though, so his insight into gravity's proportionality to mass was invaluable, and possibly even affected Newton's formulation on how gravity works. However, across a large body, variations in

r

can create a significant tidal force.

Notes

- Note 1: Proposition 75, Theorem 35: p.956 - I.Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman, translators: Isaac Newton, The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Preceded by A Guide to Newton's Principia, by I.Bernard Cohen. University of California Press 1999 ISBN 0-520-08816-6 ISBN 0-520-08817-4
- Note 2: See the works of Stillman Drake, for a comprehensive study of Galileo and his times, the Scientific Revolution.
- Max Born (1924), Einstein's Theory of Relativity (The 1962 Dover edition, page 348 lists a table documenting the observed and calculated values for the precession of the perihelion of Mercury, Venus, and Earth.)

References

-
-
-

External links

- [http://einstein.stanford.edu/ Gravity Probe B Experiment]
- [http://www.hkshum.net/whatisgravity/ What Is Gravity? - Aimed for Kids 8+ ]
- [http://www.intelligent-forces.com Intelligent Forces Theory] Satirical "Anti-Gravitationalism" website Category:Introductory physics Category:Celestial mechanics ko:중력 ja:重力 ms:Graviti

Air resistance

:This page is about forces which tend to slow a moving object. For other uses, see Drag (disambiguation). For a solid object moving through a fluid or gas, drag is the sum of all the aerodynamic or hydrodynamic forces in the direction of the external fluid flow. It therefore acts to oppose the motion of the object, and in a powered vehicle it is overcome by thrust. Types of drag are generally divided into three categories: parasitic drag, lift-induced drag and wave drag. Parasitic drag includes form drag, skin friction and interference drag. Lift-induced drag is only relevant when wings or a lifting body are present, and is therefore usually discussed only in the aviation perspective of drag. Beyond these two kinds of drag there is a third kind of drag, called wave drag, that occurs when the solid object is moving through the fluid at or near the speed of sound in that fluid. The overall drag of an object is characterized by a dimensionless number called the drag coefficient, and is calculated using the drag equation. Assuming a constant drag coefficient, drag will vary as the square of velocity. Thus, the resultant power needed to overcome this drag will vary as the cube of velocity. Wind resistance is a layman's term used to describe drag. Its use is often vague, and is usually used in a relative sense (e.g. A badminton shuttlecock has more wind resistance than a squash ball).

General relativity

General relativity (GR) is the geometrical theory of gravitation published by Albert Einstein in 1915. It unifies special relativity and Isaac Newton's law of universal gravitation with the insight that gravitation is not viewed as being due to a force (in the traditional sense) but rather a manifestation of curved space and time, this curvature being produced by the mass-energy content of the spacetime.

__TOC__

Overview

spacetime In this theory, spacetime is treated as a 4-dimensional Lorentzian manifold which is curved by the presence of mass, energy, and momentum (or stress-energy) within it. The relationship between stress-energy and the curvature of spacetime is governed by the Einstein field equations. The motion of objects being influenced solely by the geometry of spacetime (inertial motion) occurs along special paths called timelike and null geodesics of spacetime.

One of the defining features of general relativity is the idea that gravitational 'force' is replaced by geometry. In general relativity, phenomena that in classical mechanics are ascribed to the action of the force of gravity (such as freefall, orbital motion, and spacecraft trajectories) are taken in general relativity to represent inertial motion in a curved spacetime. So what people standing on the surface of the Earth perceive as the 'force of gravity' is a result of their undergoing a continuous physical acceleration caused by the mechanical resistance of the surface that they are standing on.

Justification

The justification for creating general relativity comes from the equivalence principle, which dictates that freefalling observers are the ones in inertial motion. A consequence of this insight is that inertial observers can accelerate with respect to each other. (Think of two balls falling on opposite sides of the Earth, for example.) This phenomenon violates Newton's first law of motion, and cannot be accounted for in the Euclidean geometry of special relativity either. To quote Einstein himself: : If all accelerated systems are equivalent, then Euclidean geometry cannot hold in all of them. [http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/HistTopics/General_relativity.html] Thus the equivalence principle led Einstein to search for a gravitational theory which involves curved spacetimes. Another motivating factor was the realization that relativity calls for gravitation to be expressed as a rank-two tensor, and not just a vector as was the case in Newtonian physics [http://www.bun.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~suchii/gen.GR3.html]. (An analogy is the electromagnetic field tensor of special relativity). Thus Einstein sought a rank-two tensor means of describing curved spacetimes surrounding massive objects. This effort came to fruition with the discovery of the Einstein field equations in 1915.

Fundamental principles

General relativity is based on a set of fundamental principles which guided its development. These are:
- The general principle of relativity: The laws of physics must be the same for all observers (accelerated or not).
- The principle of general covariance: The laws of physics must take the same form in all coordinate systems.
- The principle that inertial motion is geodesic motion: The world lines of particles unaffected by physical forces are timelike or null geodesics of spacetime.
- The principle of local Lorentz invariance: The laws of special relativity apply locally for all inertial observers.
- Spacetime is curved: This permits gravitational effects such as freefall to be described as a form of inertial motion. (See the discussion below of a person standing on Earth, under "Coordinate vs. physical acceleration.")
- Spacetime curvature is created by stress-energy within the spacetime: This is described in general relativity by the Einstein Field Equations. (The equivalence principle, which was the starting point for the development of general relativity, ended up being a consequence of the general principle of relativity and the principle that inertial motion is geodesic motion.)

Spacetime as a curved Lorentzian manifold

In general relativity, the concept of spacetime (which was introduced by Hermann Minkowski for special relativity) is modified. In general relativity spacetime is
- curved: Spacetime has a non-Euclidean geometry. In special relativity, spacetime is flat.
- Lorentzian: The metrics of spacetime must have a mixed metric signature. This is inherited from special relativity.
- four dimensional: to cover the three spatial dimensions and time. This is also inherited from special relativity. The curvature of spacetime (caused by the presence of stress-energy) can be viewed intuitively in the following way. Placing a heavy object such as a bowling ball on a trampoline will produce a 'dent' in the trampoline. This is analogous to a large mass such as the Earth causing the local spacetime geometry to curve. This is represented by the image at the top of this article. The larger the mass, the bigger the amount of curvature. A relatively light object placed in the vicinity of the 'dent', such as a ping-pong ball, will accelerate towards the bowling ball in a manner governed by the 'dent'. Firing the ping-pong ball at just the right speed towards the 'dent' will result in the ping-pong ball 'orbiting' the bowling ball. This is analogous to the Moon orbiting the Earth, for example. Similarly, in general relativity massive objects do not directly impart a force on other massive objects as hypothesized in Newton's action at a distance idea. Instead (in a manner analogous to the ping-pong ball's response to the bowling ball's dent rather than the bowling ball itself), other massive objects respond to how the first massive object curves spacetime.

The mathematics of general relativity

:Full article: Mathematics of general relativity Due to the expectation that spacetime is curved, Riemannian geometry (also known as non-Euclidean geometry) must be used. In essence, spacetime does not adhere to the "common sense" rules of Euclidean geometry, but instead objects that were initially traveling in parallel paths through spacetime (meaning that their velocities do not differ to first order in their separation) come to travel in a non-parallel fashion. This effect is called geodesic deviation, and it is used in general relativity as an alternative to gravity. For example, two people on the Earth heading due north from different positions on the equator are initially traveling on parallel paths, yet at the north pole those paths will cross. Similarly, two balls initially at rest with respect to and above the surface of the Earth (which are parallel paths by virtue of being at rest with respect to each other) come to have a converging component of relative velocity as both accelerate towards the center of the Earth due to their subsequent freefall. (Another way of looking at this is how a single ball moving in a purely timelike fashion parallel to the center of the Earth comes through geodesic motion to be moving towards the center of the Earth.) The requirements of the mathematics of general relativity are further modified by the other principles. Local Lorentz Invariance requires that the manifolds described in GR be 4-dimensional and Lorentzian instead of Riemannian. In addition, the principle of general covariance forces that math to be expressed using tensor calculus. Tensor calculus permits a manifold as mapped with a coordinate system to be equipped with a metric tensor of spacetime which describes the incremental (spacetime) intervals between coordinates from which both the geodesic equations of motion and the curvature tensor of the spacetime can be ascertained.

The Einstein field equations

:Full article: Einstein field equations The Einstein field equations (EFE) describe how stress-energy causes curvature of spacetime and are usually written in tensor form (using abstract index notation) as :

G_ = \kappa\, T_ \

where

G_ \

is the Einstein tensor,

T_ \

is the stress-energy tensor and

\kappa \

is a constant. The tensors

G_ \

and

T_ \

are both rank 2 symmetric tensors, i.e. they can each be thought of as 4×4 matrices each of which contains 10 independent terms. The solutions of the EFE are metrics of spacetime. These metrics describe the structure of spacetime given the stress-energy and coordinate mapping used to obtain that solution. Being non-linear differential equations, the EFE often defy attempts to obtain an exact solution; however, many such solutions are known. The EFE reduce to Newton's law of gravity in the limiting cases of a weak gravitational field and slow speed relative to the speed of light. In fact, the value of

\kappa \

in the EFE is determined to be

\kappa = 8 \pi G / c^4 \

by making these two approximations. The EFE are the identifying feature of general relativity. Other theories built of the same premises include additional rules and/or constraints. The result almost invariably is a theory with different field equations (such as Brans-Dicke theory, teleparallelism, Rosen bimetric theory, and Einstein-Cartan theory).

Coordinate vs. physical acceleration

One of the greatest sources of confusion about general relativity comes from the need to distinguish between coordinate and physical accelerations. In classical mechanics, space is preferentially mapped with a Cartesian coordinate system. Inertial motion then occurs as one moves through this space at a consistent coordinate rate with respect to time. Any change in this rate of progression must be due to a force, and therefore a physical and coordinate acceleration were in classical mechanics one and the same. It is important to note that in special relativity that same kind of Cartesian coordinate system was used, with time being added as a fourth dimension and defined for an observer using the Einstein synchronization procedure. As a result, physical and coordinate acceleration correspond in special relativity too, although their magnitudes may vary. In general relativity, the elegance of a flat spacetime and the ability to use a preferred coordinate system are lost (due to stress-energy curving spacetime and the principle of general covariance). Consequently, coordinate and physical accelerations become sundered. For example: Try using a radial coordinate system in classical mechanics. In this system, an inertially moving object which passes by (instead of through) the origin point is found to first be moving mostly inwards, then to be moving tangentially with respect to the origin, and finally to be moving outwards, yet is moving in a straight line. This is an example of an inertially moving object undergoing a coordinate acceleration, and the way this coordinate acceleration changes as the object travels are given by the geodesic equations for the manifold and coordinate system in use. Another more direct example is the case of someone standing on the Earth, where they are at rest with respect to the surface coordinates for the Earth (latitude, longitude, and elevation) but are undergoing a continuous physical acceleration because the mechanical resistance of the Earth's surface keeps them from free falling.

Predictions of General Relativity

:(For more detailed information about tests and predictions of general relativity, see Tests of general relativity)

Gravitational effects

Acceleration effects

These effects occur in any accelerated frame of reference, and are therefore independent of the curvature of spacetime. (Note however that spacetime curvature usually is the source the causative acceleration when these effects are being observed.)
- Gravitational redshifting of light: The frequency of light will decrease (shifting visible light towards the red end of the spectrum) as it moves to higher gravitational potentials. Confirmed by the Pound-Rebka expe

Mass

Introduction

Units of mass

Inertial mass

Gravitational mass

Equivalence of inertial and gravitational masses

Relativistic relation among mass, energy and momentum

References

See also

External links

Mass (disambiguation)

See also

Matter

Matter in physics

See also

Force

Elementary concepts

Quantitative definition

Types of force

Properties of force

Forces in theory

Units of measurement

Non-SI units of force and mass

Conversions

Forces in everyday life

Forces in the laboratory

Founding experiments

Instruments to measure forces

History

See also

References

External links

Gravitational field

Newton's law of universal gravitation

Vector form

Gravitational field

Problems with Newton's theory

Theoretical concerns

Disagreement with observation

Newton's reservations

Einstein's theory of gravitation

Units of measurement and variations in gravity

Comparison with electromagnetic force

Gravity and quantum mechanics

Experimental tests of theories

Recent Alternative theories

Historical Alternative theories

Self-gravitating system

Special applications of gravity

Comparative gravities of different planets and Earth's moon

Mathematical equations for a falling body

Gravitational potential

Acceleration relative to the rotating Earth

History of gravitational theory

Notes

See also

References

External links

Air resistance

See also

General relativity

Overview

Justification

Fundamental principles

Spacetime as a curved Lorentzian manifold

The mathematics of general relativity

The Einstein field equations

Coordinate vs. physical acceleration

Predictions of General Relativity

Gravitational effects

Acceleration effects