:: wikimiki.org ::

Lbf

Lbf

The pound-force is a non-SI unit of force or weight (properly abbreviated "lb_f" or "lbf"). The pound-force is equal to a mass of one avoirdupois pound multiplied by the standard acceleration due to gravity on Earth (which is defined as exactly 9.806 65 m/s², or exactly 196,133/6096 ft/s², or approximately 32.174 05 ft/s²). Though pounds-force had been used in low-precision measurements since the 18th century, they were never well-defined units until the 20th century. It was in 1901 when the CGPM first adopted a standard acceleration of gravity for the purpose of defining grams-force and kilograms-force, a value often borrowed to define pounds-force, though other values such as 32.16 ft/s² (9.80237 m/s²) have been used as well. In SI units, a pound-force is equal to exactly 4.448 221 615 260 5 newtons, if the metric standard acceleration of gravity is borrowed for this purpose. See pound (weight) for a more complete discussion of customary units of force and mass. Category:Units of force Category:Imperial units Category:Customary units in the United States ja:重量ポンド

SI

The International System of Units (abbreviated SI from the French language name Système International d'Unités) is the modern form of the metric system. It is the world's most widely used system of units, both in everyday commerce and in science. The older metric system included several groupings of units. The SI was developed in 1960 from one of these, the metre-kilogram-second (MKS) system, rather than the centimetre-gram-second (CGS) system, which, in turn, had many variants. The SI introduced several newly named units. The SI is not static; it is a living set of standards where units are created and definitions are modified with international agreement as measurement technology progresses. With few exceptions (such as draught beer sales in the United Kingdom), the system is legally being used in every country in the world, and many countries do not maintain official definitions of other units. In the United States, industrial use of SI is increasing, but popular use is still limited. In the United Kingdom, conversion to metric units is official policy but not yet complete. Those countries that still recognize non-SI units (e.g. the US and UK) have redefined most of their traditional, non-SI units in terms of SI units.

History

:See main articles: metre, kilogram, second, ampere, Kelvin, and candela. The metric system was officially adopted in France after the French Revolution. During the history of the metric system a number of variations have evolved and their use spread around the world replacing many traditional measurement systems. By the end of World War II a number of different systems of measurement were still in use throughout the world. Some of these systems were metric system variations whilst others were based on the Imperial and American systems. It was recognised that additional steps were needed to promote a worldwide measurement system. As a result the 9th General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM), in 1948, asked the International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM) to conduct an international study of the measurement needs of the scientific, technical, and educational communities. Based on the findings of this study, the 10th CGPM in 1954 decided that an international system should be derived from six base units to provide for the measurement of temperature and optical radiation in addition to mechanical and electromagnetic quantities. The six base units recommended were the metre, kilogram, second, ampere, Kelvin degree (later renamed the kelvin), and the candela. In 1960, the 11th CGPM named the system the International System of Units, abbreviated SI from the French name: Le Système International d'Unités. The seventh base unit, the mole, was added in 1970 by the 14th CGPM. The International System is now either obligatory or permissible throughout the world. It is administered by the standards organisation: the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (International Bureau of Weights and Measures).
Units
:Main articles: SI base unit, SI derived unit, SI prefix The international system of units consists of a set of units together with a set of prefixes. The units of SI can be divided into two subsets. There are the seven base units. Each of these base units are dimensionally independent. From these seven base units several other units are derived. In addition to the SI units there are also a set of non-SI units accepted for use with SI. A prefix may be added to units to produce a multiple of the original unit. All multiples are integer powers of ten. For example, kilo- denotes a multiple of a thousand and milli- denotes a multiple of a thousandth hence there are one thousand millimetres to the metre and one thousand metres to the kilometre. The prefixes are never combined: a millionth of a kilogram is a milligram not a microkilogram.
SI writing style

- Symbols are written in lower case, except for symbols derived from the name of a person. For example, the unit of pressure is named after Blaise Pascal, so its symbol is written "Pa" whereas the unit itself is written "pascal". The one exception is the litre, whose original abbreviation "l" is dangerously similar to "1". The NIST recommends that "L" be used instead, a usage which is common in the U.S., Canada and Australia, and has been accepted as an alternative by the CGPM. The cursive "ℓ" is occasionally seen, especially in Japan, but this is not currently recommended by any standards body. For more information, see Litre.
- Symbols are written without grammatical markers when used with singular numerals: i.e. "25 kg", not "25 kgs". Pluralization would be language dependent; "s" plurals (as in French and English) are particularly undesirable since "s" is the symbol of the second. Other cases may be marked in a language-dependent manner, e.g. Finnish 25 kg:lla = 25 kilogrammalla "with 25 kg".
- Symbols do not have an appended period (.).
- It is preferable to write symbols in upright Roman type (m for metres, L for litres), so as to differentiate from the italic type used for mathematical variables (m for mass, l for length).
- A space should separate the number and the symbol, e.g. "2.21 kg", "7.3×10² m²", "22 °C" [http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/SP811/sec07.html]. Exceptions are the symbols for plane angular degrees, minutes and seconds (°, ′ and ″), which are placed immediately after the number with no intervening space.
- Spaces should be used to group decimal digits in threes, e.g. 1 000 000 or 342 142 (in contrast to the commas or dots used in other systems, e.g. 1,000,000 or 1.000.000).
- The 10th resolution of CGPM in 2003 declared that "the symbol for the decimal marker shall be either the point on the line or the comma on the line". In practice, the full stop is used in English, and the comma in most other European languages.
- Symbols for derived units formed from multiple units by multiplication are joined with a space or centre dot (·), e.g. N m or N·m.
- Symbols formed by division of two units are joined with a solidus (/), or given as a negative exponent. For example, the "metre per second" can be written "m/s", "m s^-1", "m·s^-1" or $\frac$ . A solidus should not be used if the result is ambiguous, i.e. "kg·m^-1·s^-2" is preferable to "kg/m/s²".
Spelling variations

- Several nations, notably the United States, typically use the spellings 'meter' and 'liter' instead of 'metre' and 'litre' in keeping with standard American English spelling. In addition, the official US spelling for the SI prefix 'deca' is 'deka'.
- The unit 'gram' is also sometimes spelled 'gramme' in English-speaking countries other than the United States, though that is an older spelling and its use is declining.
Cultural issues
The swift worldwide adoption of the metric system as a tool of economy and everyday commerce was based mainly on the lack of customary systems in many countries to adequately describe some concepts, or as a result of an attempt to standardize the many regional variations in the customary system. International factors also affected the adoption of the metric system, as many countries increased their trade. Scientifically, it provides ease when dealing with very large and small quantities because it lines up so well with our decimal numeral system. Cultural differences can be represented in the local everyday uses of metric units. For example, bread is sold in one-half, one or two kilogram sizes in many countries, but you buy them by multiples of one hundred grams in the former USSR. In some countries, the informal cup measurement has become 250 mL, and prices for items are sometimes given per 100 g rather than per kilogram. A profound cultural difference between physicists and engineers, especially radio engineers, existed prior to the adoption of the metre-kilogram-second (MKS) system and hence its descendent, SI. Engineers work with volts, amperes, ohms, farads, and coulombs, which are of great practical utility, while the centimetre-gram-second (CGS) units, which, though appropriate for theoretical physics, can be inconvenient for electrical engineering usage and are largely unfamiliar to householders using appliances rated in volts and watts. People with diabetes test their plasma glucose level regularly. In the U.S., measurement are recorded in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL); in Europe, the standard is millimole/liter (mmol/L). The fine-tuning that has happened to the metric base units over the past 200 years, as experts have tried periodically to refine the metric system to fit the best scientific research do not affect the everyday use of metric units. Since most non-SI units, such as the U.S. customary units, are nowadays defined in terms of SI units, any change in the definition of the SI units results in a change of the definition of the older units as well.
See also

- Units of measurement
- Weights and measures
- Mesures usuelles
- Metrified English unit
- History of measurement
- Other systems of measurement:
- Imperial units
- U.S. customary units
- Metre-tonne-second system of units
- Chinese system of units
- Planck units
- Atomic units
- Geometrized units
- CODATA
- Metrication
- Metric system in the United States
- Metrology
- UTC (Coordinated Universal Time)
- Binary prefixes - used to quantify large amounts of computer data
- Orders of magnitude
- ISO 31
External links
Official
- [http://www.bipm.fr/en/si/ BIPM (SI maintenance agency)] (home page)
- [http://www.bipm.org/en/si/si_brochure/ BIPM brochure] (SI reference)
- [http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=5448&ICS1=1 ISO 1000:1992 SI units and recommendations for the use of their multiples and of certain other units], with its price tag of 99 Swiss francs for a 22 page, coverless pamphlet showing why the public is sometimes a little slow to pick up on their recommendations. Information
- [http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/index.html US NIST reference on SI]
- [http://ts.nist.gov/ts/htdocs/200/202/pub814.htm#chart chart]
- [http://www.aticourses.com/international_system_units.htm SI - Its history and use in science and industry]
- [http://www.unc.edu/~rowlett/units/ A Dictionary of Units of Measurement]
- [http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/ntr/russisch/si-einheiten.html5 Cyrillic transcription of SI symbols]
- Judson, Lewis B., Weights and Measures Standards of the United States: A brief history, NBS Special Publication 447, orig. iss. October 1963, updated March 1976 ([http://ts.nist.gov/ts/htdocs/200/202/SP%20447.pdf 46 page PDF file])
- [http://www.france-property-and-information.com/metric_conversion_table.htm Metric system and conversion tables (courtesy French property advice)]
- [http://www.metre.info metre-info - an encyclopaedia of all metric units] Pro-metric pressure groups
- [http://www.ukma.org.uk/ The UK Metric Association]
- [http://www.metric.org/ The US Metric Association] Pro-customary measures pressure groups
- [http://www.bwmaonline.com/ The British Weights and Measures Association]
Further reading

- I. Mills, Tomislav Cvitas, Klaus Homann, Nikola Kallay, IUPAC: Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry, 2nd ed., Blackwell Science Inc 1993, ISBN 0632035838. Category:SI units Category:Systems of units Category:International standards Category:Dimensional analysis ko:SI 단위계 ja:国際単位系 simple:SI th:หน่วยเอสไอ

Force

:For other senses of this word, see force (disambiguation). In physics, a force is an external cause responsible for any change of a physical system. For instance, a person holding a dog by a rope is experiencing the force applied by the rope on their hand, and the cause for its pulling forward is the force exercised by the rope. The kinetic expression of this change is, according to Newton's second law, acceleration, non kinetic expressions such as deformation can also occur. The SI unit for force is the newton.

Elementary concepts

Force in its most primitive definition can be thought of as that which when acting alone causes an object to accelerate. In a practical sense forces can be divided into two groups: contact forces and field forces. Contact forces require the physical contact of one object with other such as a hammer striking a nail or the force exerted by a gas under pressure - gas produced by exploding gunpowder forces a heavy ball out of a cannon. Field forces on the other hand need no physical medium of contact. Gravity and magnetism are examples of such forces. It should be noted however, that fundamentally all forces are in fact field forces. The force of hammer striking the nail in the previous example turns out to be a clash of the electric forces in both hammer and nail. Nevertheless it is appropriate in some cases to maintain these two classifications for ease of understanding.

Quantitative definition

In physics models, the point-like system is used, where objects are represented as one-dimensional points at their centre of mass. The only change the system can experience is a change of its momentum (its speed). Since the rise of the atomic theory, any physical system has been considered in classical physics as composed of point-like systems called atoms or molecules. Therefore, all forces can be defined by their effect; that is, by the change of movement they induce on point-like systems. This change of movement can be quantified by the acceleration (the derivative of velocity). The discovery by Isaac Newton that a given force will induce an acceleration in inverse proportion to a quantity called the mass of inertia or inertial mass which is independent of the speed of the system is Newton's second law. This law allows us to predict the effect of a force on any point-like system whose mass is known. It is usually written as: :F = dp/dt = d(m·v)/dt = m·a (in the case where m does not depend on t) where :F is the force (a vector quantity), :p is the momentum, :t is the time, :v is the velocity, :m is the mass, and :a=d²x/dt² is the acceleration, the second derivative with respect to t of the position vector x. If the mass m is measured in kilograms and the acceleration a is measured in metres per second squared, then the unit of force is kilogram × metre/second squared. This unit is called the newton: 1 N = 1 kg x 1 m/s². This equation is a system of three second-order differential equations with respect to the three-dimensional position vector which is an unknown function of time. This equation can be solved if F is a known function of x and some of its derivatives and if the mass m is known. Morevover the boundary conditions are required; for example, the values of the position vector and x and the velocity v at the starting time, say t=0. Of course, this formula is only useful if one knows the numerical values of F and m. The definition above is an implicit definition, arrived at as follows. One defines a reference system (one litre of water) and a reference force (the gravitational force applied by the Earth on it at the altitude of Paris). One takes Newton's second law for granted (one postulates that it is true) and measures the acceleration induced by the reference force on the reference system. This gives us a mass unit (1 kg) and a force unit (the older unit of 1 kilogram-force = 9.81 N). Once this is done, one can measure any force by the acceleration it induces on the reference system and measure the inertial mass of any system by measuring the acceleration induced on this system by the reference force. Force is often considered a fundamental quantity in physics, but there are more fundamental quantities, such as momentum (p = mass m x velocity v). Energy, measured in joules, is still less fundamental than force and momentum, because it is defined as work, and work is defined in terms of force. The two most fundamental theories of nature - quantum electrodynamics and general relativity - do not contain the concept of force at all. Although not the most fundamental quantity in physics, force is an important basic mathematical concept from which other concepts, such work and pressure (measured in pascals), are derived. Force is sometimes confused with stress.

Types of force

There are four known fundamental forces in nature.
- Nuclear forces acting between subatomic particles
- Electromagnetic forces between electric charges
- Weak forces arising from radioactive decay
- Gravitational forces between masses Quantum field theory accurately models the first three fundamental forces, but does not model quantum gravity. Quantum gravity on a large scale can, however, be described by general relativity. The four fundamental forces describe every observable phenomenon including the many other forces observed such as: Coulomb's force (the force between electrical charges), gravitational force (force between masses), magnetic force, frictional forces, centripetal, centrifugal, impact force, and spring force, to name a few. Forces can also be classified into conservative forces and nonconservative forces. Conservative forces are equivalent to the gradient of a potential, and include gravity, electromagnetic force, and spring force. Nonconservative forces include friction and drag.

Properties of force

Because momentum is a vector, then force, being its time derivative, is also a vector - it has magnitude and direction. Forces can be added together using the parallelogram of force. When two forces act on an object, the resulting force, the resultant, is the vector sum of the original forces. This is called the principle of superposition. The magnitude of the resultant varies from zero to the sum of the magnitudes of the two forces, depending on the angle between their lines of action. If the two forces are equal, but opposite, the resultant is zero. This condition is called static equilibrium, with the result that the object remains at rest or moves with a constant velocity. As well as being added, forces can be can also be broken down (or 'resolved'). For example, a horizontal force pointing northeast can be split into two forces, one pointing north, and one pointing east. Summing these component forces using vector addition yields the original force. Force vectors can also be three-dimensional, with the third (vertical) component at right-angles to the two horizontal components.

Forces in theory

The total (Newtonian) force, in newtons, on an object at any given time is defined as the rate of change of the object's velocity multiplied by the object's mass: :

\mathbf = \lim_ \frac

where :m is the inertial mass of the particle (measured in kilograms) :v_o is its initial velocity (measured in metres per second) :v is its final velocity (measured in metres per second) :T is the time from the initial state to the final state (measured in seconds); :Lim T→0 is the limit as T tends towards zero. Force was so defined to explain the effects of superimposing situations: if in one situation, a force is experienced by a particle, and if in another situation another force is experienced by that particle, then in a third situation, which (according to standard physical practice) is taken to be a combination of the two individual situations, the force experienced by the particle will be the vector sum of the individual forces experienced in the first two situations. This superposition of forces, and the definition of inertial frames and inertial mass, are the empirical content of Newton's laws of motion. There are other ways to look at the above definition of force. First, the mass of a body multiplied by its velocity is called its momentum, p, so the above definition is equivalent to: :

\textbf=

If F is not constant over Δt, then this is the definition of average force over the time interval. To apply it at an instant we apply an idea from calculus. If we graph p as a function of time, the average force will be the slope of the line connecting the momentum at two times. Taking the limit as the two times get closer together gives the slope at an instant, which is called the derivative: :

\textbf=

Many forces are associated with a potential energy field. For instance, the gravitational force acting upon a body can be seen as the action of the gravitational field that is present at the body's location. The potential field is defined as that field whose gradient is equal and opposite to the force produced at every point: :

\textbf=-\nabla U

The derivative of force with respect to time is called yank. Higher order derivatives are sometimes used, but they lack names because of their rarity. In most explanations of mechanics, force is usually defined only implicitly, in terms of the equations that work with it. Some physicists, philosophers and mathematicians, such as Ernst Mach, Clifford Truesdell and Walter Noll, have found this problematic and sought a more explicit definition of force. According to the Special theory of relativity the mass of an object increases as it's velocity and therefore it's energy increases. The law of force must then be modified to the following: :

\textbf=

where :v is the mass's velocity :c is the speed of light. Note that the equation is undefined if the mass's speed is equal to c because one then has to divide by zero. This is one reason most physicists believe an object with nonzero rest mass can not be accelerated to the speed of light, as this would require an infinite force.

Units of measurement

The SI unit used to measure force is the newton (symbol N), which is equivalent to kg·m·s⁻².

Non-SI units of force and mass

The F=m·a relationship can be used with any consistent units (SI or CGS). If these units are not consistent, a more general form, F=k·m·a, can be used, where the constant k is a conversion factor dependent upon the units being used. For example, in imperial engineering units, F is measured in "pounds force" or "lbf", m in "pounds mass" or "lb", and a in feet per second squared. In this particular system, one needs to use the more general form above, usually written F=m·a/g_c with the constant normally used for this purpose g_c = 32.174 lb·ft/(lbf·s²) equal to the reciprocal of the k above. As with the kilogram, the pound is colloquially used as both a unit of mass and a unit of force. 1 lbf is the force required to accelerate 1 lb at 32.174 ft per second squared, since 32.174 ft per second squared is the standard acceleration due to terrestrial gravity. Another imperial unit of mass is the slug, defined as 32.174 lb. It is the mass that accelerates by one foot per second squared when a force of one lbf is exerted on it. When the standard gee (an acceleration of 9.80665 m/s²) is used to define pounds force, the mass in pounds is numerically equal to the weight in pounds force. However, even at sea level on Earth, the actual acceleration of free fall is quite variable, over 0.53% more at the poles than at the equator. Thus, a mass of 1.0000 lb at sea level at the equator exerts a force due to gravity of 0.9973 lbf, whereas a mass of 1.000 lb at sea level at the poles exerts a force due to gravity of 1.0026 lbf. The normal average sea level acceleration on Earth (World Gravity Formula 1980) is 9.79764 m/s², so on average at sea level on Earth, 1.0000 lb will exerts a force of 0.9991 lbf. The equivalence 1 lb = 0.453 592 37 kg is always true, by definition, anywhere in the universe. If you use the standard gee which is official for defining kilograms force to define pounds force as well, then the same relationship will hold between pounds-force and kilograms-force (an old non-SI unit is still used). If a different value is used to define pounds force, then the relationship to kilograms force will be slightly different—but in any case, that relationship is also a constant anywhere in the universe. What is not constant throughout the universe is the amount of force in terms of pounds-force (or any other force units) which 1 lb will exert due to gravity. By analogy with the slug, there is a rarely used unit of mass called the "metric slug". This is the mass that accelerates at one metre per second squared when pushed by a force of one kgf. An item with a mass of 10 kg has a mass of 1.01972661 metric slugs (= 10 kg divided by 9.80665 kg per metric slug). This unit is also known by various other names such as the hyl, TME (from a German acronym), and mug (from metric slug). Another unit of force called the poundal (pdl) is defined as the force that accelerates 1 lbm at 1 foot per second squared. Given that 1 lbf = 32.174 lb times one foot per second squared, we have 1 lbf = 32.174 pdl. The kilogram-force is a unit of force that was used in various fields of science and technology. In 1901, the CGPM improved the definition of the kilogram-force, adopting a standard acceleration of gravity for the purpose, and making the kilogram-force equal to the force exerted by a mass of 1 kg when accelerated by 9.80665 m/s². The kilogram-force is not a part of the modern SI system, but is still used in applications such as:
- Thrust of jet and rocket engines
- Spoke tension of bicycles
- Draw weight of bows
- Torque wrenches in units such as "meter kilograms" or "kilogram centimetres" (the kilograms are rarely identified as units of force)
- Engine torque output (kgf·m expressed in various word orders, spellings, and symbols)
- Pressure gauges in "kg/cm²" or "kgf/cm²" In colloquial, non-scientific usage, the "kilograms" used for "weight" are almost always the proper SI units for this purpose. They are units of mass, not units of force. The symbol "kgm" for kilograms is also sometimes encountered. This might occasionally be an attempt to disintinguish kilograms as units of mass from the "kgf" symbol for the units of force. It might also be used as a symbol for those obsolete torque units (kilogram-force metres) mentioned above, used without properly separating the units for kilogram and metre with either a space or a centered dot.

Conversions

Below are several coversion factors between various mesurements of force:
- 1 kgf (kilopond kp) = 9.80665 newtons
- 1 metric slug = 9.80665 kg
- 1 lbf = 32.174 poundals
- 1 slug = 32.174 lb
- 1 kgf = 2.2046 lbf

Forces in everyday life

Forces are part of everyday life, with examples such as:
- gravity: objects fall, even after being thrown upwards, or slide and roll down
- friction: floors and objects that are not extremely slippery
- spring force, objects resist tensile stress, compressive stress and/or shear stress, objects bounce back.
- electromagnetic force: attraction of magnets
- movement created by force: the movement of objects when force is applied.

Forces in the laboratory

Founding experiments

- Galileo Galilei used rolling balls to disprove the Aristotelian theory of motion (1602 - 1607)
- Henry Cavendish's torsion bar experiment measured the force of gravity between two masses (1798)

Instruments to measure forces

- spring balance
- pivot balance
- forcemeter

History

Force was first described by Archimedes.

References

-
-
-

External links

- [http://jumk.de/calc/force.shtml Calculation: force F - English and American units to metric units]
- [http://calc.skyrocket.de/en/ Online Unit Converter - Conversion of many different units]
- [http://www.patbelford.com/gallery/web3d/education/forceworkpower/index.html Interactive demonstration of Force-Work-Power Relationship] Category:Introductory physics ko:힘 ms:Daya (fizik) ja:力 simple:Force (physics)

Pound (weight)

:This article is about the unit of weight. For other uses, see Pound. The pound is the name of a number of units of mass or weight, all in the range of 300 to 600 grams.

Today

Of at least five previous English pounds only one, the avoirdupois pound (454 g), is still in general use and one, the troy pound (373 g), is mostly used in its subdivision, the ounce. There was also a trone pound in Scotland, equal to 21 to 28 oz avoirdupois. Furthermore a metrified or metric pound of half a kilogram is used informally in some places and was once official in some countries.

Origins

The Latin word libra describes a Roman unit of weight similar to a pound, and the abbreviation “lb” for the unit of weight and the signs £ and ₤ (crossed-out Ls) for the currency derived from this. The word “pound” comes from the Latin pendere, “to weigh”; Latin libra means “scales, balances”.

Measurement systems

In the Imperial system (often referred to as the pound-inch system, or the English system in the United States) there are two basic pounds defined, and also an obsolete definition of one variant of the pound.

Avoirdupois or international

Main article: avoirdupois The avoirdupois pound was invented by London merchants in 1303. The pound (avoirdupois) or international pound, abbreviation "lb" or sometimes # in the United States, is the mass unit defined as exactly 0.45359237 kilogram (or 453.59237 grams). This definition has been in effect since a 1959 agreement among the national standards laboratories of the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand. [http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/PUBS_LIB/FedRegister/FRdoc59-5442.pdf] It is part of the avoirdupois system of mass units. In the United States, the pound has been officially defined as a unit of mass and defined in relation to the kilogram since 1893, but its value in relation to the kilogram was altered slightly in 1894, and again to its current value in 1959 (which only differs from the 1894 definition by approximately one part in 10 million). In the United Kingdom, the avoirdupois pound was defined as a unit of mass by the Weights and Measures Act of 1878, but having a very slightly different value (in relation to the kilogram) than it does now, of approximately 0.453592338 kg. (This was a measured quantity, with the independently maintained artifact still serving as the official standard for this pound.) This old value is sometimes called the imperial pound, and this definition and terminology are obsolete unless referring to the slightly-different 1878 definition. There are 16 ounces in a pound (avoirdupois), an ounce being equal to 28.349523125 grams. This pound is equal to exactly 7000 grains, where a grain is exactly 0.06479891 gram. This relationship between avoirdupois pounds and troy grains has held true since the avoirdupois pound was redefined in terms of the troy units in the reign of Henry VIII, abandoning independent standards which had been measured as about 7002 grains troy. Since then, the grain has often been considered as a part of the avoirdupois system as well, even though it does not fit very well in that system.

Troy

Main article: Troy weight A troy pound, named for the French market town of Troyes in France where English merchants traded at least as early as the time of Charlemagne (early ninth century), was the mass unit used in England by apothecaries and jewelers. In Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, and other places the unit is no longer a legal unit for trade, but its ounce subdivision enjoys a specific exemption from their metrication laws. The troy pound is a unit of mass equalling exactly 0.3732417216 kilogram (or 373.2417216 grams). There are 12 troy ounces in a troy pound, a troy ounce being equal to 31.1034768 grams. A troy pound is equal to exactly 5760 grains, making a troy pound equal to exactly 144/175 pound avoirdupois. The troy pound is now used only for measurements of precious metals such as gold, silver, and platinum, and sometimes gems such as opals. Most weight measurements of precious metals using pounds and ounces use troy pounds and ounces, even though it is not always explicitly stated that this is the case. Some notable exceptions are Encyclopædia Britannica (a U.S. encyclopedia for about a century now) which uses either avoirdupois pounds or troy ounces, likely never both in the same article (which would make an awkward system with 14 7/12 ounces to a pound), and King Tut's sarcophagus lid, which is often stated to have been 242 or 243 pounds (avoirdupois (110 kg); when it is, much less commonly, stated as 296 pounds (110 kg), then the pounds are troy). ; 1 troy pound := 12 troy ounces = 240 pennyweight = 5760 grains. A pennyweight was literally the weight of a penny, as adopted by King Henry II (1154–1189). This was a sterling silver penny weighing 1/240 of a troy pound (1.55517384 g).

Metric

Main article: kilogram In many countries that use the SI or metric system, the pound (or its translation, for example, the German Pfund, the French livre, the Dutch pond, the Spanish and Portuguese libras, or the Chinese jin) is used as an informal term for half of a kilogram, therefore for this case the pound is 500 grams. In many cases, this was an official redefinition back in the 19th century, but its use is generally no longer officially sanctioned. These replaced hundreds of older pounds, for example, one of around 459 to 460 grams in Spain, Portugal, and Latin America; 498.1 g in Norway; and several different ones in what is now Germany. In the case of the Dutch pond, this was officially redefined as 1 kg, with an ounce of 100 g; the former has fallen out of use, and if the pound is used today it is likely the 500 g variety, but the 100 g ounce remains in limited use. Despite the use of the pound term persisting as a slang term no scale or measuring device exists in metric countries that measures in pounds. All scales are in grams and a pound must be determined by weighing the product in grams. Thus a pound is weighed out as 500 g.

Ambiguity

If neither “avoirdupois” nor “troy” is specified, nowadays the international pound (avoirdupois) is meant and is by law the only proper definition in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada; the troy pound has been officially abandoned in the United Kingdom. The valuation of precious metals on U.S. exchanges is specified as dollars per troy ounce, although the fact that the troy ounce is used is usually implied. In the colloquial context of vegetable and meat sales within metric countries, a metric pound (500 g) is usually implied.

Unit of weight

Standards bodies define the pound as a unit of mass, which are the pounds most people in everyday usage use as a unit of weight. When a pound is called a “unit of weight”, it is usually a unit of mass. In many contexts the word “weight” is used in its original meaning:
- In commerce, the terms “net weight”, troy weight and carat weight actually refer to mass rather than weight. The pounds used for this purpose are units of mass.
- The scientific terms “molecular weight”, “atomic weight”, and “formula weight” all actually refer to mass, which is why some now refer to “molecular mass”, etc. If a “pound mole” is used, it is based on the pound as a unit of mass. Pounds are also used for the force definitions of weight, as well as for other forces, in which the pound force is a unit of force equal to 4.448 newtons. That is the force due to gravity of a pound (avoirdupois) where the acceleration of gravity is 32.17405 ft/s² or 9.80665 m/s². Note, however, that the troy units of weight are never units of force.

Force, weight, and mass

Historically, the pound predates the understanding of the distinction between force and mass. Once that distinction became clear, it was natural to ask whether the pound should be construed as a unit of mass, or a unit of force. But because the foot-pound-second systems are no longer used in science (and are gradually approaching extinction even in U.S. engineering work), many scientists today would be as bemused by this question as by the question of whether the shekel is a unit of mass or of force. In many contexts, there is a long history of considering the pound to be a unit of mass:
- Pounds were primarily a measure of how much stuff people had, for the purposes of trade. We know what we use for those purposes today—the only pounds legal for trade anywhere in the world are those defined as units of mass exactly equal to 0.45359237 kg.
- Mass-measuring balances were the only weighing instruments anybody ever used before the 19th century.
- Over time, the various keepers of the standards redefined pounds in terms of the metric system (which has happened in case of the avoirdupois and troy pounds as well as the metric pounds), they were defined in terms of the kilogram, not the dyne or the newton.
- When units such as the British thermal unit are defined based on the pound, those pounds are units of mass just like the grams or kilograms used as the basis of the definition of calories.
- On labels of products sold in the United States, the pounds and ounces are units of mass, like the grams and kilograms which appear right alongside them. On the other hand, pounds are always to be construed as a unit of force in contexts such as these:
- Thrust of rocket or jet engines in pounds-force.
- Torque in foot-pounds or pound-feet.
- Pressure in pounds per square foot or pounds per square inch.
- Energy in foot-pounds.

Systems of units

There are three practical ways of doing calculations with mass and force in the fps systems (and other systems such as inch-pound-second systems not discussed here), which the following table summarizes and compares with the SI. The absolute and gravitational fps systems are coherent systems of units which both share with the SI the advantage of avoiding needless complication in several of the formulas used, whereas the engineering fps system requires the introduction of the factor g_c, which is a dimensionless constant, usually 32.17405 lb·ft/(lbf·s²), which is numerically equal to the value of the standard acceleration of gravity on Earth used to define a pound-force, when expressed in ft/s². This must be distinguished from the actual local value of g. No one of the three fps systems is more correct than the other two. None of our ordinary measurements are made in the context of any of these specialized subsets of mechanical units, used only in calculations. Although the U.S. National Bureau of Standards [http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/PUBS_LIB/FedRegister/FRdoc59-5442.pdf] has defined the pound as a unit of mass, and the pound-force as a unit of force, this distinction is not widely recognized among working physicists, because the fps system has not been used in physics, even in the United States, since the early 20th century. When giving data to be used in calculations, it is not a good idea to use the term pound without clarifying whether mass or force is intended. If force is what is meant, the symbol "lbf" or the term "pounds-force" can be used for clarification. For mass, one can specify "pounds-mass." The reader is cautioned that in some contexts "lb" may be defined as force or mass by convention. For example, in structural engineering applications, "lb" is almost exclusively used as a unit of force, and the slug or kip·s²/ft is preferred to the pound-mass (lbm). Slugs are used since the factor g_c is not required for proper application of Newton's Second Law.

Notes

It is primarily the United States which uses them today, though other places such as livestock markets in Canada do still sell cattle in cents per pound, even though they sell hogs in cents per kilogram (actually, it is most often quoted as dollars per hundred pounds and dollars per hundred kilograms). Copies of the standard pound in London were distributed to other locations, where they served as the local standard. These copies have the same mass at the new location, even though they exert a (slightly) different amount of force due to regional variations in the Earth's gravitational field. The standards for pounds always were standards of mass, not standards of force. 1000 slugs, though a name like "kiloslug" is rarely seen. Here, kip is a unit of force.

Popular Culture

The term pound is also used to describe a customary greeting in which two individuals touch fists.

External links

- History of the pound as a unit of mass: [http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/PUBS_LIB/FedRegister/FRdoc59-5442.pdf U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology Official Definition, showing history]
- Official abbreviations and definitions: [http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/SP811/appenB9.html#MASSinertia U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 811] Category:Customary units in the United States Category:Imperial units Category:Units of mass ja:ポンド (質量)

Gravity

Gravity is the force of attraction between massive particles. Weight is determined by the mass of an object and its location in a gravitational field. While a great deal is known about the properties of gravity, the ultimate cause of the gravitational force remains an open question. General relativity is the most successful theory of gravitation to date. It postulates that mass and energy curve space-time, resulting in the phenomenon known as gravity. The effect of the bending of spacetime is often misunderstood as most people seem to prefer to think of a falling object as accelerating when the facts do not support that assumption. Skydivers do not feel any acceleration (other than from wind resistance). Gravity is acceleration.

F=\dot=m\dot+\dotv\,\!

means (if the mass is unvarying) that there must be a force that causes a mass to accelerate. For a rocket ship, that is the rocket engine. For the earth, it is the compression of the mass between something on the surface of the earth and the earth's center of mass. The acceleration is in relation to spacetime in that the weight one feels is one's resistance to deviating from one's path in spacetime. The same holds true in the rocket ship except that a rocket engine supplies the force to accelerate an occupant from his spacetime path. There is no difference between the weight he feels because of gravity or the rocket.

Newton's law of universal gravitation

Newton's law of universal gravitation states the following: :Every object in the Universe attracts every other object with a force directed along the line of centers of mass for the two objects. This force is proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the separation between the centers of mass of the two objects. Given that the force is along the line through the two masses, the law can be stated symbolically as follows. :

F = - G \frac

where: :F is the magnitude of the (repulsive) gravitational force between two objects :G is the gravitational constant, that is approximately : G = 6.67 × 10⁻¹¹ N m² kg^-2 :m₁ is the mass of first object :m₂ is the mass of second object :r is the distance between the objects It can be seen that this repulsive force F is always negative, and this means that the net attractive force is positive. The minus sign is used to hold the same value meaning as in the Coulomb's Law, where a positive force as result means repulsion between two charges. Thus gravity is proportional to the mass of each object, but has an inverse square relationship with the distance between the centres of each mass. Strictly speaking, this law applies only to point-like objects. If the objects have spatial extent, the force has to be calculated by integrating the force (in vector form, see below) over the extents of the two bodies. It can be shown that for an object with a spherically-symmetric distribution of mass, the integral gives the same gravitational attraction on masses outside it as if the object were a point mass.¹ This law of universal gravitation was originally formulated by Isaac Newton in his work, the Principia Mathematica (1687). Professor William Whewell of Cambridge University, author of History of the Inductive Sciences (1837) stated: ::The law of gravitation is indisputably and incomparably the greatest scientific discovery ever made, whether we look at the advance which it involved, the extent of the truth disclosed, or the fundamental and satisfactory nature of this truth. [In A Treasury of Science ed. Harlow Shapley et al, Harper & Bros. NY: 1946] The history of gravitation as a physical concept is considered in more detail below.

Vector form

below Newton's law of universal gravitation can be written as a vector equation to account for the direction of the gravitational force as well as its magnitude. In this formula, quantities in bold represent vectors. :

\mathbf_ =
 G 
 \, \mathbf_

\mathbf_ =
 - G 
 \, \mathbf_

where :F₁₂ is the force on object 1 due to object 2 :G is the gravitational constant :m₁ and m₂ are the masses of the objects 1 and 2 :r₂₁ = | r₂ − r₁ | is the distance between objects 2 and 1 :

\mathbf_ \equiv \frac

is the unit vector from object 2 to 1 It can be seen, that the vector form of the equation is the same as the scalar form, except for the vector value of F and the unit vector. Also, it can be seen that F₁₂ = − F₂₁. Gravitational acceleration is given by the same formula except for one of the factors m: :

\mathbf =
  G 
  \, \mathbf

Gravitational field

The gravitational field is a vector field that describes the gravitational force an object of given mass experiences in any given place in space. It is a generalization of the vector form, which becomes particularly useful if more than 2 objects are involved (such as a rocket between the Earth and the Moon). For 2 objects (e.g. object 1 is a rocket, object 2 the Earth), we simply write

\mathbf r

instead of

\mathbf r_

and

m

instead of

m_1

and define the gravitational field

\mathbf g(\mathbf r)

as: :

\mathbf g(\mathbf r) =
 G 
 \, \mathbf

so that we can write: :

\mathbf( \mathbf r) = m \mathbf g(\mathbf r)

This formulation is independent of the objects causing the field. The field has units of force divided by mass; in SI, this is N·kg⁻¹.

Problems with Newton's theory

Although Newton's formulation of gravitation is quite accurate for most practical purposes, it has a few problems:

Theoretical concerns

- There is no prospect of identifying the mediator of gravity. Newton himself felt the inexplicable action at a distance to be unsatisfactory (see "Newton's reservations" below).
- Newton's theory requires that gravitational force is transmitted instantaneously. Given classical assumptions of the nature of space and time, this is necessary to preserve the conservation of angular momentum observed by Johannes Kepler. However, it is in direct conflict with Einstein's theory of special relativity which places an upper limit—the speed of light in vacuum—on the velocity at which signals can be transmitted.

Disagreement with observation

- Newton's theory does not fully explain the precession of the perihelion of the orbit of the planet Mercury. There is a 43 arcsecond per century discrepancy between the Newtonian prediction (resulting from the gravitational tugs of the other planets) and the observed precession.
- The predicted deflection of light by gravity is only half as much as observations of this deflection, which were made after General Relativity was developed in 1915.
- The observed fact that gravitational and inertial masses are the same for all bodies is unexplained within Newton's system. General relativity takes this as a postulate. See equivalence principle.

Newton's reservations

It's important to understand that while Newton was able to formulate his law of gravity in his monumental work, he was deeply uncomfortable with the notion of "action at a distance" which his equations implied. He never, in his words, "assigned the cause of this power". In all other cases, he used the phenomenon of motion to explain the origin of various forces acting on bodies, but in the case of gravity, he was unable to experimentally identify the motion that produces the force of gravity. Moreover, he refused to even offer a hypothesis as to the cause of this force on grounds that to do so was contrary to sound science. He lamented the fact that "philosophers have hitherto attempted the search of nature in vain" for the source of the gravitational force, as he was convinced "by many reasons" that there were "causes hitherto unknown" that were fundamental to all the "phenomena of nature". These fundamental phenomena are still under investigation and, though hypotheses abound, the definitive answer is yet to be found. While it is true that Einstein's hypotheses are successful in explaining the effects of gravitational forces more precisely than Newton's in certain cases, he too never assigned the cause of this power, in his theories. It is said that in Einstein's equations, "matter tells space how to curve, and space tells matter how to move", but this new idea, completely foreign to the world of Newton, does not enable Einstein to assign the "cause of this power" to curve space any more than the Law of Universal Gravitation enabled Newton to assign its cause. In Newton's own words: :I wish we could derive the rest of the phenomena of nature by the same kind of reasoning from mechanical principles; for I am induced by many reasons to suspect that they may all depend upon certain forces by which the particles of bodies, by some causes hitherto unknown, are either mutually impelled towards each other, and cohere in regular figures, or are repelled and recede from each other; which forces being unknown, philosophers have hitherto attempted the search of nature in vain. If science is eventually able to discover the cause of the gravitational force, Newton's wish could eventually be fulfilled as well. It should be noted that here, the word "cause" is not being used in the same sense as "cause and effect" or "the defendant caused the victim to die". Rather, when Newton uses the word "cause," he (apparently) is referring to an "explanation". In other words, a phrase like "Newtonian gravity is the cause of planetary motion" means simply that Newtonian gravity explains the motion of the planets. See Causality and Causality (physics).

Einstein's theory of gravitation

Einstein's theory of gravitation answered the problems with Newton's theory noted above. In a revolutionary move, his theory of general relativity (1915) stated that the presence of mass, energy, and momentum causes spacetime to become curved. Because of this curvature, the paths that objects in inertial motion follow can "deviate" or change direction over time. This deviation appears to us as an acceleration towards massive objects, which Newton characterized as being gravity. In general relativity however, this acceleration or free fall is actually inertial motion. So objects in a gravitational field appear to fall at the same rate due to their being in inertial motion while the observer is the one being accelerated. (This identification of free fall and inertia is known as the Equivalence principle.) The relationship between the presence of mass/energy/momentum and the curvature of spacetime is given by the Einstein field equations. The actual shapes of spacetime are described by solutions of the Einstein field equations. In particular, the Schwarzschild solution (1916) describes the gravitational field around a spherically symmetric massive object. The geodesics of the Schwarzschild solution describe the observed behavior of objects being acted on gravitationally, including the anomalous perihelion precession of Mercury and the bending of light as it passes the Sun. Arthur Eddington found observational evidence for the bending of light passing the Sun as predicted by general relativity in 1919. Subsequent observations have confirmed Eddington's results, and observations of a pulsar which is occulted by the Sun every year have permitted this confirmation to be done to a high degree of accuracy. There have also in the years since 1919 been numerous other tests of general relativity, all of which have confirmed Einstein's theory.

Units of measurement and variations in gravity

tests of general relativity. (ESA image)]] Gravitational phenomena are measured in various units, depending on the purpose. The gravitational constant is measured in newtons times metre squared per kilogram squared. Gravitational acceleration, and acceleration in general, is measured in metres per second squared or in non-SI units such as galileos, gees, or feet per second squared. The acceleration due to gravity at the Earth's surface is approximately 9.81 m/s², more precise values depending on the location. A standard value of the Earth's gravitational acceleration has been adopted, called g_n. When the typical range of interesting values is from zero to tens of metres per second squared, as in aircraft, acceleration is often stated in multiples of g_n. When used as a measurement unit, the standard acceleration is often called "gee", as g can be mistaken for g, the gram symbol. For other purposes, measurements in millimetres or micrometres per second squared (mm/s² or µm/s²) or in multiples of milligals or milligalileos (1 mGal = 1/1000 Gal), a non-SI unit still common in some fields such as geophysics. A related unit is the eotvos, which is a cgs unit of the gravitational gradient. Mountains and other geological features cause subtle variations in the Earth's gravitational field; the magnitude of the variation per unit distance is measured in inverse seconds squared or in eotvoses. Typical variations with time are 2 µm/s² (0.2 mGal) during a day, due to the tides, i.e. the gravity due to the Moon and the Sun. A larger variation in the effect of gravity occurs when we move from the equator to the poles. The effective force of gravity decreases as the distance from the equator decreases, due to the rotation of the Earth, and the resulting centrifugal force and flattening of the Earth. The centrifugal force causes an effective force 'up' which effectively counteracts gravity, while the flattening of the Earth causes the poles to be closer to the center of mass of the Earth. It is also related to the fact that the Earth's density changes from the surface of the planet to its centre. The sea-level gravitational acceleration is 9.780 m/s² at the equator and 9.832 m/s² at the poles, so an object will exert about 0.5% more force due to gravity at sea level at the poles than at sea level at the equator [http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=310].

Comparison with electromagnetic force

The gravitational interaction of protons is approximately a factor 10³⁶ weaker than the electromagnetic repulsion. This factor is independent of distance, because both interactions are inversely proportional to the square of the distance. Therefore on an atomic scale mutual gravity is negligible. However, the main interaction between common objects and the Earth and between celestial bodies is gravity, because at this scale matter is electrically neutral: even if in both bodies there were a surplus or deficit of only one electron for every 10¹⁸ protons and neutrons this would already be enough to cancel gravity (or in the case of a surplus in one and a deficit in the other: double the interaction). However, the main interactions between the charged particles in cosmic plasma (that makes up over 99% of the universe by volume), are electromagnetic forces. In terms of Planck units: the charge of a proton is 0.085, while the mass is only . From that point of view, the gravitational force is not small as such, but because masses are small. The relative weakness of gravity can be demonstrated with a small magnet picking up pieces of iron. The small magnet is able to overwhelm the gravitational interaction of the entire Earth. Similarly, when doing a chin-up, the electromagnetic interaction within your muscle cells is able to overcome the force induced by Earth on your entire body. Gravity is small unless at least one of the two bodies is large or one body is very dense and the other is close by, but the small gravitational interaction exerted by bodies of ordinary size can fairly easily be detected through experiments such as the Cavendish torsion bar experiment. Cavendish torsion bar experiment Further reading
- Jefimenko, Oleg D., "Causality, electromagnetic induction, and gravitation : a different approach to the theory of electromagnetic and gravitational fields". Star City [West Virginia] : Electret Scientific Co., c1992. ISBN 0917406095
- Heaviside, Oliver, "[http://www.as.wvu.edu/coll03/phys/www/Heavisid.htm A gravitational and electromagnetic analogy]". The Electrician, 1893.

Gravity and quantum mechanics

It is strongly believed that three of the four fundamental forces (the strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, and the electromagnetic force) are manifestations of a single, more fundamental force. Combining gravity with these forces of quantum mechanics to create a theory of quantum gravity is currently an important topic of research amongst physicists. General relativity is essentially a geometric theory of gravity. Quantum mechanics relies on interactions between particles, but general relativity requires no exchange of particles in its explanation of gravity. Scientists have theorized about the graviton (a messenger particle that transmits the force of gravity) for years, but have been frustrated in their attempts to find a consistent quantum theory for it. Many believe that string theory holds a great deal of promise to unify general relativity and quantum mechanics, but this promise has yet to be realized. It is notable that in general relativity gravitational radiation (which under the rules of quantum mechanics must be composed of gravitons) is only created in situations where the curvature of spacetime is oscillating, such as for co-orbiting objects. The amount of gravitational radiation emitted by the solar system and its planetary systems is far too small to measure. However, gravitational radiation has been indirectly observed as an energy loss over time in binary pulsar systems such as PSR1913+16). It is believed that neutron star mergers and black hole formation may create detectable amounts of gravitational radiation. Gravitational radiation observatories such as LIGO have been created to study the problem. No confirmed detections have been made of this hypothetical radiation, but as the science behind LIGO is refined and as the instruments themselves are endowed with greater sensitivity over the next decade, this may change.

Experimental tests of theories

Today General Relativity is accepted as the standard description of gravitational phenomena. (Alternative theories of gravitation exist but are more complicated than General Relativity.) General Relativity is consistent with all currently available measurements of large-scale phenomena. For weak gravitational fields and bodies moving at slow speeds at small distances, Einstein's General Relativity gives almost exactly the same predictions as Newton's law of gravitation. Crucial experiments that justified the adoption of General Relativity over Newtonian gravity were the classical tests: the gravitational redshift, the deflection of light rays by the Sun, and the precession of the orbit of Mercury. More recent experimental confirmations of General Relativity were the (indirect) deduction of gravitational waves being emitted from orbiting binary stars, the existence of neutron stars and black holes, gravitational lensing, and the convergence of measurements in observational cosmology to an approximately flat model of the observable Universe, with a matter density parameter of approximately 30% of the critical density and a cosmological constant of approximately 70% of the critical density. The equivalence principle, the postulate of general relativity that presumes that inertial mass and gravitational mass are the same, is also under test. Past, present, and future tests are discussed in the equivalence principle section. Even to this day, scientists try to challenge General Relativity with more and more precise direct experiments. The goal of these tests is to shed light on the yet unknown relationship between Gravity and Quantum Mechanics. Space probes are used to either make very sensitive measurements over large distances, or to bring the instruments into an environment that is much more controlled than it could be on Earth. For example, in 2004 a dedicated satellite for gravity experiments, called Gravity Probe B, was launched to test general relativity's predicted frame-dragging effect, among others. Also, land-based experiments like LIGO and a host of "bar detectors" are trying to detect gravitational waves directly. A space-based hunt for gravitational waves, LISA, is in its early stages. It should be sensitive to low frequency gravitational waves from many sources, perhaps including the Big Bang. Speed of gravity: Einstein's theory of relativity predicts that the speed of gravity (defined as the speed at which changes in location of a mass are propagated to other masses) should be consistent with the speed of light. In 2002, the Fomalont-Kopeikin experiment produced measurements of the speed of gravity which matched this prediction. However, this experiment has not yet been widely peer-reviewed, and is facing criticism from those who claim that Fomalont-Kopeikin did nothing more than measure the speed of light in a convoluted manner. The Pioneer anomaly is an empirical observation that the positions of the Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11 space probes differ very slightly from what would be expected according to known effects (gravitational or otherwise). The possibility of new physics has not been ruled out, despite very thorough investigation in search of a more prosaic explanation.

Recent Alternative theories

- Brans-Dicke theory of gravity
- Rosen bi-metric theory of gravity
- In the modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND), Mordehai Milgrom proposes a modification of Newton's Second Law of motion for small accelerations.

Historical Alternative theories

- Nikola Tesla challenged Albert Einstein's theory of relativity, announcing he was working on a Dynamic theory of gravity (which began between 1892 and 1894) and argued that a "field of force" was a better concept and focused on media with electromagnetic energy that fill all of space.
- In 1967 Andrei Sakharov proposed something similar, if not essentially identical. His theory has been adopted and promoted by Messrs. Haisch, Rueda and Puthoff who, among other things, explain that gravitational and inertial mass are identical and that high speed rotation can reduce (relative) mass. Combining these notions with those of T. T. Brown, it is relatively easy to conceive how field propulsion vehicles such as "flying saucers" could be engineered given a suitable source of power.
- Georges-Louis LeSage proposed a gravity mechanism, now commonly called LeSage gravity, based on a fluid-based explanation where a light gas fills the entire universe.

Self-gravitating system

A self-gravitating system is a system of masses kept together by mutual gravity. An example is a binary star.

Special applications of gravity

A height difference can provide a useful pressure in a liquid, as in the case of an intravenous drip or a water tower, and can even supply enough power for hydroelectricity. A weight hanging from a cable over a pulley provides a constant tension in the cable, also in the part on the other side of the pulley. pulley Dubuque, Iowa]] Molten lead, when poured into the top of a shot tower, will coalesce into a rain of spherical lead shot, first separating into droplets, forming molten spheres, and finally freezing solid, undergoing many of the same effects as meteoritic tektites, which will cool into spherical, or near-spherical shapes in free-fall. A fractionation tower can be used to manufacture some materials by separating out the material components based on their specific gravity.

Comparative gravities of different planets and Earth's moon

The standard acceleration due to gravity at the Earth's surface is, by convention, equal to 9.80665 metres per second squared. (The local acceleration of gravity varies slightly over the surface of the Earth; see gee for details.) This quantity is known variously as g_n, g_e (sometimes this is the normal equatorial value on Earth, 9.78033 m/s²), g₀, gee, or simply g (which is also used for the variable local value). The following is a list of the gravitational accelerations (in multiples of g) at the Sun, the surfaces of each of the planets in the solar system, and the Earth's moon : Note: The "surface" is taken to mean the cloud tops of the gas giants (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune) in the above table. It is usually specified as the location where the pressure is equal to a certain value (normally 75 kPa?). For the Sun, the "surface" is taken to mean the photosphere. Within the Earth, the gravitational field peaks at the core-mantle boundary, where it has a value of 10.7 m/s². For spherical bodies surface gravity in m/s² is 2.8 × 10⁻¹⁰ times the radius in m times the average density in kg/m³. When flying from Earth to Mars, climbing against the field of the Earth at the start is 100 000 times heavier than climbing against the force of the sun for the rest of the flight.

Mathematical equations for a falling body

These equations describe the motion of a falling body under acceleration g near the surface of the Earth. mantle Here, the acceleration of gravity is a constant, g, because in the vector equation above,

_

would be a constant vector, pointing straight down. In this case, Newton's law of gravitation simplifies to the law :F = mg The following equations ignore air resistance and the rotation of the Earth, but are usually accurate enough for heights not exceeding the tallest man-made structures. They fail to describe the Coriolis effect, for example. They are extremely accurate on the surface of the Moon, where the atmosphere is almost nil. Astronaut David Scott demonstrated this with a hammer and a feather. Galileo was the first to demonstrate and then formulate these equations. He used a ramp to study rolling balls, effectively slowing down the acceleration enough so that he could measure the time as the ball rolled down a known distance down the ramp. He used a water clock to measure the time; by using an "extremely accurate balance" to measure the amount of water, he could measure the time elapsed. ² :For Earth

\ g=9.8\, \mbox/\mbox^2 \quad

For other planets, multiply

\ g

by the ratio of the gravitational accelerations shown above. Note: "Average" means average in time. Note: Distance traveled, d, and time taken, t, must be in the same system of units as acceleration g. See dimensional analysis. To convert metres per second to kilometres per hour (km/h) multiply by 3.6, and to convert feet per second to miles per hour (mph) multiply by 0.68 (or, precisely, 15/22).

Gravitational potential

For any mass distribution there is a scalar field, the gravitational potential (a scalar potential), which is the gravitational potential energy per unit mass of a point mass, as function of position. It is

- G \int dm

where the integral is taken over all mass. Minus its gradient is the gravity field itself, and minus its Laplacian is the divergence of the gravity field, which is everywhere equal to -4πG times the local density. Thus when outside masses the potential satisfies Laplace's equation (i.e., the potential is a harmonic function), and when inside masses the potential satisfies Poisson's equation with, as right-hand side, 4πG times the local density.

Acceleration relative to the rotating Earth

The acceleration measured on the rotating surface of the Earth is not quite the same as the acceleration that is measured for a free-falling body because of the centrifugal force. In other words, the apparent acceleration in the rotating frame of reference is the total gravity vector minus a small vector toward the north-south axis of the Earth, corresponding to staying stationary in that frame reference.

History of gravitational theory

The first mathematical formulation of gravity was published in 1687 by Sir Isaac Newton. His law of universal gravitation was the standard theory of gravity until work by Albert Einstein and others on general relativity. Since calculations in general relativity are complicated, and Newtonian gravity is sufficiently accurate for calculations involving weak gravitational fields (e.g., launching rockets, projectiles, pendulums, etc.), Newton's formulae are generally preferred. Although the law of universal gravitation was first clearly and rigorously formulated by Isaac Newton, the phenomenon was observed and recorded by others. Even Ptolemy had a vague conception of a force tending toward the center of the Earth which not only kept bodies upon its surface, but in some way upheld the order of the universe. Johannes Kepler inferred that the planets move in their orbits under some influence or force exerted by the Sun; but the laws of motion were not then sufficiently developed, nor were Kepler's ideas of force sufficiently clear, to make a precise statement of the nature of the force. Christiaan Huygens and Robert Hooke, contemporaries of Newton, saw that Kepler's third law implied a force which varied inversely as the square of the distance. Newton's conceptual advance was to understand that the same force that causes a thrown rock to fall back to the Earth keeps the planets in orbit around the Sun, and the Moon in orbit around the Earth. Newton was not alone in making significant contributions to the understanding of gravity. Before Newton, Galileo Galilei corrected a common misconception, started by Aristotle, that objects with different mass fall at different rates. To Aristotle, it simply made sense that objects of different mass would fall at different rates, and that was enough for him. Galileo, however, actually tried dropping objects of different mass at the same time. Aside from differences due to friction from the air, Galileo observed that all masses accelerate the same. Using Newton's equation,

F = m a

, it is plain to us why: :

F = - = m_1a_1

The above equation says that mass

m_1

will accelerate at acceleration

a_1

under the force of gravity, but divide both sides of the equation by

m_1

and: :

a_1 =

Nowhere in the above equation does the mass of the falling body appear. When dealing with objects near the surface of a planet, the change in r divided by the initial r is so small that the acceleration due to gravity appears to be perfectly constant. The acceleration due to gravity on Earth is usually called g, and its value is about 9.82 m/s². Galileo didn't have Newton's equations, though, so his insight into gravity's proportionality to mass was invaluable, and possibly even affected Newton's formulation on how gravity works. However, across a large body, variations in

r

can create a significant tidal force.

Notes

- Note 1: Proposition 75, Theorem 35: p.956 - I.Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman, translators: Isaac Newton, The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Preceded by A Guide to Newton's Principia, by I.Bernard Cohen. University of California Press 1999 ISBN 0-520-08816-6 ISBN 0-520-08817-4
- Note 2: See the works of Stillman Drake, for a comprehensive study of Galileo and his times, the Scientific Revolution.
- Max Born (1924), Einstein's Theory of Relativity (The 1962 Dover edition, page 348 lists a table documenting the observed and calculated values for the precession of the perihelion of Mercury, Venus, and Earth.)

References

-
-
-

External links

- [http://einstein.stanford.edu/ Gravity Probe B Experiment]
- [http://www.hkshum.net/whatisgravity/ What Is Gravity? - Aimed for Kids 8+ ]
- [http://www.intelligent-forces.com Intelligent Forces Theory] Satirical "Anti-Gravitationalism" website Category:Introductory physics Category:Celestial mechanics ko:중력 ja:重力 ms:Graviti

Metre

:This article is about the unit of length. For other uses of metre or meter, see meter (disambiguation). The metre (Commonwealth English) or meter (American English) (symbol: m) is the SI base unit of length. It is defined as the length of the path travelled by light in absolute vacuum during a time interval of 1/299,792,458 of a second. Adding SI prefixes to metre creates multiples and submultiples; for example kilometre (1000 metres; kilo- = 1000) and millimetre (one thousandth of a metre; milli- = 1 / 1 000).

Conversions

1 metre is equivalent to:
- exactly 1/0.9144 yards (approximately 1.0936 yards)
- exactly 1/0.3048 feet (approximately 3.2808 feet)
- exactly 10000/254 inches (approximately 39.370 inches)

History

The word metre is from the Greek metron (μετρον), "a measure" via the French mètre. Its first recorded usage in English is from 1797. In the 18th century, there were two favoured approaches to the definition of the standard unit of length. One suggested defining the metre as the length of a pendulum with a half-period of one second. The other suggested defining the metre as one ten-millionth of the length of the earth's meridian along a quadrant (one-fourth the polar circumference of the earth). In 1791, the French Academy of Sciences selected the meridional definition over the pendular definition because of the slight variation of the force of gravity over the surface of the earth, which affects the period of a pendulum. In 1793, France adopted the metre, with this definition, as its official unit of length. Although it was later determined that the first prototype metre bar was short by a fifth of a millimetre due to miscalculation of the flattening of the earth, this length became the standard. So, the circumference of the Earth through the poles is approximately forty million metres. Earth in a vacuum.]] In the 1870s and in light of modern precision, a series of international conferences were held to devise new metric standards. The Metre Convention (Convention du Mètre) of 1875 mandated the establishment of a permanent International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM: Bureau International des Poids et Mesures) to be located in Sèvres, France. This new organisation would preserve the new prototype metre and kilogram when constructed, distribute national metric prototypes, and would maintain comparisons between them and non-metric measurement standards. This organisation created a new prototype bar in 1889 at the first General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM: Conférence Générale des Poids et Mesures), establishing the International Prototype Metre as the distance between two lines on a standard bar of an alloy of ninety percent platinum and ten percent iridium, measured at the melting point of ice. In 1893, the standard metre was first measured with an interferometer by Albert A. Michelson, the inventor of the device and an advocate of using some particular wavelength of light as a standard of distance. By 1925, interferometry was in regular use at the BIPM. However, the International Prototype Metre remained the standard until 1960, when the eleventh CGPM defined the metre in the new SI system as equal to 1,650,763.73 wavelengths of the orange-red emission line in the electromagnetic spectrum of the krypton-86 atom in a vacuum. The original international prototype of the metre is still kept at the BIPM under the conditions specified in 1889. To further reduce uncertainty, the seventeenth CGPM of 1983 replaced the definition of the metre with its current definition, thus fixing the length of the metre in terms of time and the speed of light: :The metre is the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second. Note that this definition exactly fixes the speed of light in a vacuum at 299,792,458 metres per second. Definitions based on the physical properties of light are more precise and reproducible because the properties of light are considered to be universally constant.

Timeline of definition

- 1790 May 8 — The French National Assembly decides that the length of the new metre would be equal to the length of a pendulum with a half-period of one second.
- 1791 March 30 — The French National Assembly accepts the proposal by the French Academy of Sciences that the new definition for the metre be equal to one ten-millionth of the length of the earth's meridian along a quadrant (one-fourth the polar circumference of the earth).
- 1795 — Provisional metre bar constructed of brass.
- 1799 December 10 — The French National Assembly specifies that the platinum metre bar, constructed on 23 June 1799 and deposited in the National Archives, as the final standard.
- 1889 September 28 — The first CGPM defines the length as the distance between two lines on a standard bar of an alloy of platinum with ten percent iridium, measured at the melting point of ice.
- 1927 October 6 — The seventh CGPM adjusts the definition of the length to be the distance, at 0 °C, between the axes of the two central lines marked on the prototype bar of platinum-iridium, this bar being subject to one standard atmosphere of pressure and supported on two cylinders of at least one centimetre diameter, symmetrically placed in the same horizontal plane at a distance of 571 millimetres from each other.
- 1960 October 20 — The eleventh CGPM defines the length to be equal to 1,650,763.73 wavelengths in vacuum of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the 2p¹⁰ and 5d⁵ quantum levels of the krypton-86 atom.
- 1983 October 21 — The seventeenth CGPM defines the length to be distance travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second.

External links

- [http://www.unitconversion.org/unit_converter/length.html?unit=meter&value=1 Length Converter: convert metre to other units, such as yard, mile, and so on]
- [http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/meter.html History of the metre at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)]
- [http://www.mel.nist.gov/div821/museum/timeline.htm Timeline of history of the metre at the NIST]
- [http://www1.bipm.org/en/scientific/length/ Bureau International des Poids et Measures - Lengths] Category:SI base units Category:Units of length ko:미터 ms:Meter ja:メートル simple:Metre th:เมตร

Second

:This article is about the unit of time. For other uses, see second (disambiguation). The second (symbol: s) is the SI base unit of time.

Definition

The second is the duration of 9 192 631 770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium-133 atom.

Origin

Originally, the second was known as a "second minute", meaning the second minute (i.e. small) division of an hour. The first division was known as a "prime minute" and is equivalent to the minute we know today.

Conversions

- 60 seconds = 1 minute
- 3 600 seconds = 1 hour
- 86.4 kiloseconds (86 400 seconds) = 1 day (in the SI sense)

Explanation

The factor of 60 may have been influenced by the Babylonians who used factors of 60 in their counting system. The hour had previously been defined by the Egyptians in terms of the rotation of the Earth as 1/24 of a mean solar day. This made the second 1/86,400 of a mean solar day. In 1956 the second was defined in terms of the period of revolution of the Earth around the Sun for a particular epoch, because by then it had become recognized that the Earth's rotation on its own axis was not sufficiently uniform as a standard of time. The Earth's motion was described in Newcomb's Tables of the Sun, which provides a formula for the motion of the Sun at the epoch 1900 based on astronomical observations made during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The second thus defined is :the fraction 1/31,556,925.9747 of the tropical year for 1900 January 0 at 12 hours ephemeris time. This definition was ratified by the Eleventh General Conference on Weights and Measures in 1960. Reference to the year 1900 does not mean that this is the epoch of a mean solar day of 86,400 seconds. Rather, it is the epoch of the tropical year of 31,556,925.9747 seconds of ephemeris time. Ephemeris Time (ET) was defined as the measure of time that brings the observed positions of the celestial bodies into accord with the Newtonian dynamical theory of motion. With the development of the atomic clock, it was decided to use atomic clocks as the basis of the definition of the second, rather than the rotation of the earth. Following several years of work, two astronomers at the